Martin Damm vs Paul Jubb — Oeiras 2 CH Round of 16

Oeiras 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Martin Damm
USA6
Martin Damm
#104ATP
1706ELO
1657Hard ELO
$338kYTD
$910kCAREER
22 yrs · 203 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 8 January 2024
hard
GBR
Paul Jubb
#338ATP
1426ELO
1403Hard ELO
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLWLW
Damm M.
6-2 3-6 7-5
Jubb P.
Damm M.
6372
Jubb P.
2651

Martin Damm defeated Paul Jubb 6-2 3-6 7-5 in the Oeiras 2 CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Martin Damm came in ranked #104.

Key context

  • Match story: Martin Damm closed it out in three sets, 6–2 3–6 7–5.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Damm M.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Jubb P.

Jubb P.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Damm M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Damm M.Jubb P.
1st serve in·Even
61%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
78%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
68%
62%
Return points won·Slight edge
33%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
12.6
4.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
4.2
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (105 vs 102). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Damm M.Jubb P.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
26
37
Break points saved·Slight edge
93
84
Break points won·Slight edge
1
6
Deciding sets·Dominant
5
44
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
84
73

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Damm M.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 56 days (−0.7)
Jubb P.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
8.0+253 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.0Hard Elo 1403
8.2Overall Elo 1706
ELO gap
1.8Overall Elo 1426
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.1
Surface form
2.9
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
7.8
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Damm M.Jubb P.
Freshness·Slight edge
92
100

Damm M.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Jubb P.: 19 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Riedi L.[8]
Damm M.[6]
7-666-2
Semi-finals
Damm M.[6]
Copil M.
6-36-757-5
Riedi L.[8]
Elias G.
6-36-3
Quarter-finals
Riedi L.[8]
Moller E.
6-36-2
Elias G.
Royer V.
6-46-4
Copil M.
Moro Canas A.[1]
6-46-767-67
Damm M.[6]
Sousa J.[3]
6-27-5
R16
Sousa J.[3]
Giustino L.
6-36-1
Damm M.[6]
Jubb P.
6-23-67-5
Copil M.
Martineau M.
7-653-66-1
Elias G.
Quinn E.
3-67-56-4
Royer V.
Kasnikowski M.
6-36-2
Moro Canas A.[1]
Holmgren A.
6-37-5
Riedi L.[8]
Fanselow S.
6-36-0
Moller E.
Dalla Valle E.
6-26-1
R32
Holmgren A.
Neuchrist M.
6-20-0
Fanselow S.
Faria J.
6-20-0
Moller E.
Alvarez Varona N.
7-51-0
Elias G.
Ilkel C.[5]
6-26-3
Giustino L.
Vrbensky M.
6-42-67-5
Damm M.[6]
Geerts M.
7-616-4
Riedi L.[8]
Mchugh A.
6-26-3
Moro Canas A.[1]
Mayo A.
2-67-626-4
Dalla Valle E.
Added D.
4-66-37-65
Copil M.
Andreev A.
6-26-757-66
Martineau M.
Janvier M.[7]
6-44-66-2
Sousa J.[3]
Vincent Ruggeri S.
7-653-67-65
Jubb P.
Pereira T.
6-46-1
Quinn E.
Domingues J.
7-56-3
Kasnikowski M.
Bourgue M.
6-11-66-3
Royer V.
Rocha H.[2]
6-36-0