Martin Damm vs Michael Geerts — Oeiras 2 CH Round of 32

Oeiras 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Martin Damm
USA6
Martin Damm
#104ATP
1706ELO
1657Hard ELO
$338kYTD
$910kCAREER
22 yrs · 203 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 8 January 2024
hard
Michael Geerts
BEL
Michael Geerts
#328ATP
1400ELO
1383Hard ELO
31 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWLW
Damm M.
7-6 6-4
Geerts M.
Damm M.
7762
Geerts M.
6140

Martin Damm defeated Michael Geerts 7-6 6-4 in the Oeiras 2 CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Martin Damm came in ranked #104.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Damm M.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Geerts M.

Geerts M.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Damm M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Damm M.Geerts M.
1st serve in·Even
61%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
78%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
68%
63%
Return points won·Even
33%
37%
Break points saved·Even
66%
62%
Aces / match·Dominant
12.6
4.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.2
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (105 vs 134). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Damm M.Geerts M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
26
9
Break points saved·Slight edge
93
82
Break points won·Even
1
3
Deciding sets·Even
5
8
Tiebreaks·Dominant
84
2

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Damm M.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 56 days (−0.7)
Geerts M.
4.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
8.2+274 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.8Hard Elo 1383
8.4Overall Elo 1706
ELO gap
1.6Overall Elo 1400
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.1
Surface form
1.7
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 6
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
9.1
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Damm M.Geerts M.
Freshness·Slight edge
97
89

Damm M.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Geerts M.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 16 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Riedi L.[8]
Damm M.[6]
7-666-2
Semi-finals
Damm M.[6]
Copil M.
6-36-757-5
Riedi L.[8]
Elias G.
6-36-3
Quarter-finals
Riedi L.[8]
Moller E.
6-36-2
Elias G.
Royer V.
6-46-4
Copil M.
Moro Canas A.[1]
6-46-767-67
Damm M.[6]
Sousa J.[3]
6-27-5
R16
Sousa J.[3]
Giustino L.
6-36-1
Damm M.[6]
Jubb P.
6-23-67-5
Copil M.
Martineau M.
7-653-66-1
Elias G.
Quinn E.
3-67-56-4
Royer V.
Kasnikowski M.
6-36-2
Moro Canas A.[1]
Holmgren A.
6-37-5
Riedi L.[8]
Fanselow S.
6-36-0
Moller E.
Dalla Valle E.
6-26-1
R32
Holmgren A.
Neuchrist M.
6-20-0
Fanselow S.
Faria J.
6-20-0
Moller E.
Alvarez Varona N.
7-51-0
Elias G.
Ilkel C.[5]
6-26-3
Giustino L.
Vrbensky M.
6-42-67-5
Damm M.[6]
Geerts M.
7-616-4
Riedi L.[8]
Mchugh A.
6-26-3
Moro Canas A.[1]
Mayo A.
2-67-626-4
Dalla Valle E.
Added D.
4-66-37-65
Copil M.
Andreev A.
6-26-757-66
Martineau M.
Janvier M.[7]
6-44-66-2
Sousa J.[3]
Vincent Ruggeri S.
7-653-67-65
Jubb P.
Pereira T.
6-46-1
Quinn E.
Domingues J.
7-56-3
Kasnikowski M.
Bourgue M.
6-11-66-3
Royer V.
Rocha H.[2]
6-36-0