Arthur Fils vs Nuno Borges — Auckland Round of 16

Auckland · ATP · Round of 16
Arthur Fils
FRA6
Arthur Fils
#24ATP
2001ELO
1930Hard ELO
$1.9MYTD
$7.9MCAREER
22 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 8 January 2024
hard
Nuno Borges
POR
Nuno Borges
#48ATP
1769ELO
1714Hard ELO
$811kYTD
$5.3MCAREER
29 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLLWL
Fils A.
6-2 6-0
Borges N.
Fils A.
662
Borges N.
200

Arthur Fils defeated Nuno Borges 6-2 6-0 in the Auckland round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Arthur Fils came in ranked #24. Arthur Fils extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-02-24DubaiR32hardNuno Borges6-2 6-1
2024-03-04Indian Wells MastersR128hardArthur Fils7-6(5) 6-2
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Fils A.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Borges N.

Borges N.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Fils A.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Fils A.Borges N.
56
Serve
36
30
Return
16

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Fils A.Borges N.
1st serve in·Even
62%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Even
65%
64%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
63%
62%
Aces / match·Even
5.6
5.9
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.0
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (128 vs 142). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Fils A.Borges N.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
89
77
Break points saved·Even
98
98
Break points won·Clear edge
70
54
Deciding sets·Even
98
96
Tiebreaks·Dominant
99
71

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Fils A.
7.4
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Borges N.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
8.4+216 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.6Hard Elo 1714
9.0Overall Elo 2001
ELO gap
1.0Overall Elo 1769
5.0
H2H
5.0
6.4
Surface form
5.3
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.6
Minutes 14d
9.1
4.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Fils A.Borges N.
Freshness·Even
88
90

Fils A.: 9 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Borges N.: 10 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Weather
22°CMainly clear
Wind 17 km/hHumidity 71%
Final
Tabilo A.
Daniel T.
6-27-5
Semi-finals
Daniel T.
Shelton B.[1]
7-57-69
Tabilo A.
Fils A.[6]
6-27-5
Quarter-finals
Fils A.[6]
Altmaier D.
7-621-0
Tabilo A.
Norrie C.[2]
W/O
Daniel T.
Muller A.
6-46-736-3
Shelton B.[1]
Carballes Baena R.
6-46-3
R16
Shelton B.[1]
Marozsan F.
6-36-4
Muller A.
Cerundolo F.[3]
6-16-1
Daniel T.
Purcell M.[8]
6-26-4
Fils A.[6]
Borges N.
6-26-0
Altmaier D.
Auger Aliassime F.[4]
7-697-5
Norrie C.[2]
Van Assche L.
6-36-766-1
Carballes Baena R.
Ofner S.[7]
7-56-3
Tabilo A.
Van De Zandschulp B.
7-56-3
R32
Tabilo A.
Gojo B.
1-66-36-2
Altmaier D.
Giron M.
7-656-2
Marozsan F.
Monfils G.
6-46-767-64
Carballes Baena R.
Bautista Agut R.
6-46-3
Ofner S.[7]
Shapovalov D.
6-46-2
Muller A.
Bonzi B.
6-37-5
Daniel T.
Vukic A.
7-57-5
Purcell M.[8]
Pannu K.
6-46-4
Fils A.[6]
Gasquet R.
6-36-4
Borges N.
Michelsen A.
0-67-666-3
Van De Zandschulp B.
Eubanks C.[5]
7-656-2
Van Assche L.
Wolf J.
6-46-2