Suzan Lamens vs Harmony Tan — Auckland Qualifying Round 1

Auckland · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
Suzan Lamens
NED
Suzan Lamens
#129WTA
1622ELO
1573Hard ELO
27 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Retired
Monday, 1 January 2024
hard
Harmony Tan
FRA
Harmony Tan
#200WTA
1585ELO
1547Hard ELO
28 yrs · 171 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWWLW
Lamens S.
3-6 6-0 3-0
Tan H.
Lamens S.
3632
Tan H.
6001

Suzan Lamens advanced when Harmony Tan retired 3-6 6-0 3-0 in the Auckland qualifying round 1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Lamens S.serving49% hold

wins 50% of points on serve vs Tan H.

Tan H.serving59% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Lamens S.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Lamens S.Tan H.
0
Serve
—
52
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Lamens S.Tan H.
1st serve in·Slight edge
61%
55%
1st serve points won·Even
63%
67%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
43%
49%
Service points won·Even
55%
59%
Return points won·Even
45%
45%
Break points saved·Slight edge
53%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.1
2.7
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.4
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (128 vs 104). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Lamens S.Tan H.
Clutch Rating·Even
43
39
Break points saved·Clear edge
51
71
Break points won·Clear edge
95
74
Deciding sets·Slight edge
31
23
Tiebreaks·Even
78
76

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Lamens S.
4.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 52 days (−0.7)
Tan H.
3.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Injury return: 273 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.5+26 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.5Hard Elo 1547
5.7Overall Elo 1622
ELO gap
4.3Overall Elo 1585
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
1.5
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Lamens S.Tan H.
Freshness·Even
100
100

Lamens S.: 18 days rest · Tan H.: 17 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw — qualifying

Q2
Fruhvirtova B.
Sakatsume H.
6-46-2
Ruse E.
Niemeier J.
6-03-66-3
Kessler M.
Yang Y.
7-56-4
Sun L.
Hruncakova V.
7-617-64
Vickery S.
Lamens S.
6-06-1
Martincova T.
Monnet C.
7-56-2
Stefanini L.
Bektas E.
6-37-5
Jimenez Kasintseva V.
Burrage J.
6-16-2
Friedsam A.
Hontama M.
4-67-57-64
Romero Gormaz L.
Janicijevic S.
6-26-2
Glushko L.
Barry M.
7-57-64
Hibino N.
Vickery S.
6-46-2
Q1
Fruhvirtova B.
Tse E.
6-17-5
Sakatsume H.
Zhao C.
6-16-3
Ruse E.
Danilina A.
6-36-3
Niemeier J.
Bolton E.
6-36-4
Kessler M.
Ponchet J.
6-26-756-3
Yang Y.
Ivanov V.
6-36-3
Hruncakova V.
Mattek Sands B.
6-16-3
Sun L.
Aiava D.
6-26-2
Vickery S.
Bozovic A.
6-06-3
Lamens S.
Tan H.
3-66-03-0
Martincova T.
Siskova A.
6-06-0
Monnet C.
Otway J.
6-36-3
Barry M.
Shibahara E.
7-616-4
Glushko L.
Chirico L.
7-636-3
Hibino N.
Tse E.
6-46-2
Vickery S.
Pigossi L.
6-26-3
Stefanini L.
Kaji H.
6-16-3
Bektas E.
Bulgaru M.
5-76-36-4
Jimenez Kasintseva V.
Konjuh A.
6-47-5
Burrage J.
Bolkvadze M.
2-67-646-3
Hontama M.
Burillo Escorihuela I.
6-16-2
Friedsam A.
Brancaccio N.
2-66-26-3
Romero Gormaz L.
Ivanov V.
6-737-636-4
Janicijevic S.
Zavatska K.
4-66-16-2