Harold Mayot vs Jesper De Jong — Noumea CH Quarter-final

Noumea CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Harold Mayot
FRA
Harold Mayot
#200ATP
1571ELO
1548Hard ELO
$72kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
24 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWWLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 1 January 2024
hard
Jesper De Jong
NED8
Jesper De Jong
#73ATP
1711ELO
1607Hard ELO
$612kYTD
$2.3MCAREER
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLWWWWWL
Mayot H.
3-6 7-5 6-4
De Jong J.
Mayot H.
3762
De Jong J.
6541

Harold Mayot defeated Jesper De Jong 3-6 7-5 6-4 in the Noumea CH quarter-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Jesper De Jong came in ranked #73, leading the head-to-head 1–0. Harold Mayot claimed a first win over Jesper De Jong in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-05-07Rome MastersQ1clayJesper De Jong6-2 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Mayot H.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs De Jong J.

De Jong J.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Mayot H.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Mayot H.De Jong J.
—
Serve
23
—
Return
17

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Mayot H.De Jong J.
1st serve in·Even
62%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
63%
Return points won·Even
39%
39%
Break points saved·Even
62%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.0
6.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.6
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (166 vs 157). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mayot H.De Jong J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
29
56
Break points saved·Even
92
90
Break points won·Clear edge
22
37
Deciding sets·Dominant
32
69
Tiebreaks·Dominant
8
57

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mayot H.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 42 days (−0.7)
De Jong J.
4.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 98 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.1Hard Elo 1548
Surface ELO
4.9+59 Hard Elo edge
4.7Overall Elo 1571
ELO gap
5.3Overall Elo 1711
5.0
H2H
5.0
5.6
Surface form
7.3
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Mayot H.De Jong J.
Freshness·Slight edge
99
92

Mayot H.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d) · De Jong J.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Cazaux A.[5]
Couacaud E.
6-16-1
Mochizuki S.
Bouzige M.
6-16-3
Semi-finals
Cazaux A.[5]
Mayot H.
7-657-64
Couacaud E.
Brouwer G.
3-67-666-4
Mochizuki S.
Rodionov J.[6]
6-36-3
Bouzige M.
Lestienne C.[8]
6-736-36-4
Quarter-finals
Mayot H.
De Jong J.[8]
3-67-56-4
Couacaud E.
Gaston H.[3]
6-746-46-0
Brouwer G.
Gasquet R.[1]
4-66-27-5
Cazaux A.[5]
Paire B.[4]
6-26-1
Bouzige M.
Fucsovics M.[2]
6-36-3
Lestienne C.[8]
Vacherot V.[4]
6-24-67-5
Mochizuki S.
Ichikawa T.
6-36-3
Rodionov J.[6]
Couacaud E.
4-66-46-2
R16
Gaston H.[3]
Jacquet K.
6-26-4
Cazaux A.[5]
Kypson P.
3-67-676-2
Brouwer G.
Moreno De Alboran N.[7]
5-77-56-2
Mayot H.
Lestienne C.[2]
6-46-3
Paire B.[4]
Sinclair C.
4-66-26-2
Couacaud E.
Bouzige M.
6-37-63
Gasquet R.[1]
Mpetshi Perricard G.
6-27-63
De Jong J.[8]
Droguet T.
6-06-0
Rodionov J.[6]
Paire B.
6-45-76-2
Ichikawa T.
Brouwer G.[7]
6-16-4
Lestienne C.[8]
Holmgren A.
5-76-27-61
Fucsovics M.[2]
Janvier M.
6-43-66-3
Vacherot V.[4]
Taguchi R.
6-16-2
Bouzige M.
Camus C.
7-56-3
Mochizuki S.
Ilagan A.
6-756-46-2
Couacaud E.
Takahashi Y.
6-36-4
R32
Cazaux A.[5]
Marie J.
6-13-66-3
Mpetshi Perricard G.
Kuzmanov D.
7-643-67-63
Brouwer G.
Fancutt T.
6-37-5
Couacaud E.
Polmans M.[6]
6-16-2
Moreno De Alboran N.[7]
Hemery C.
7-56-746-4
Mayot H.
Blanchet U.
6-26-0
Gasquet R.[1]
Marchenko I.
7-656-2
Gaston H.[3]
Chazal M.
6-717-57-64
De Jong J.[8]
Delaney J.
6-17-5
Jacquet K.
Ochi M.
6-16-2
Bouzige M.
Grenier H.
4-66-37-62
Kypson P.
Mott B.
6-37-5
Sinclair C.
Statham J.
6-726-46-4
Paire B.[4]
Blancaneaux G.
7-53-66-3
Droguet T.
Brancaccio R.
6-30-66-4
Lestienne C.[2]
Moriya H.
6-16-0
Couacaud E.
Pannu K.
4-66-46-1
Holmgren A.
Courte H.
6-16-2
Bouzige M.
Moller E.[5]
4-66-36-3
Camus C.
Ogura K.
6-26-1
Lestienne C.[8]
Delaney J.
6-36-3
Fucsovics M.[2]
Cabral F.
6-26-3
Paire B.
Sinclair C.
6-746-17-5
Ilagan A.
De Jong J.[3]
6-47-65
Taguchi R.
Vallejo A.
6-36-4
Vacherot V.[4]
Hazawa S.
6-36-4
Mochizuki S.
Saitoh K.
6-46-4
Brouwer G.[7]
Tomic B.
6-46-1
Takahashi Y.
Mannarino A.[1]
6-36-0
Rodionov J.[6]
Bayldon B.
6-46-2
Ichikawa T.
Branger L.
6-42-66-2
Janvier M.
Matsuda R.
6-36-3