Andrey Rublev vs Arthur Fils — Hong Kong Quarter-final

Hong Kong · ATP · Quarter-final
Andrey Rublev
RUS1
Andrey Rublev
#13ATP
1902ELO
1849Hard ELO
$1.6MYTD
$34MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 1 January 2024
hard
Arthur Fils
FRA8
Arthur Fils
#24ATP
2001ELO
1930Hard ELO
$1.9MYTD
$7.9MCAREER
22 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWWWWW
Rublev A.
6-4 1-6 6-2
Fils A.
Rublev A.
6162
Fils A.
4621

Andrey Rublev defeated Arthur Fils 6-4 1-6 6-2 in the Hong Kong quarter-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Arthur Fils came in leading the head-to-head 2–0. Andrey Rublev claimed a first win over Arthur Fils in three meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Andrey Rublev closed it out in three sets, 6–4 1–6 6–2.

Head to head

0–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-04-13BarcelonaFclayArthur Fils6-2 7-6(2)
2025-04-07Monte Carlo MastersR16clayArthur Fils6-2 6-3
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Rublev A.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Fils A.

Fils A.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Rublev A.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Rublev A.Fils A.
55
Serve
56
52
Return
30

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Rublev A.Fils A.
1st serve in·Even
61%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
76%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Even
67%
66%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
66%
63%
Aces / match·Clear edge
7.9
5.5
Double faults / match·Even
2.7
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (150 vs 128). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Rublev A.Fils A.
Clutch Rating·Even
88
89
Break points saved·Even
100
98
Break points won·Even
72
70
Deciding sets·Even
97
98
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
92
99

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Rublev A.
4.4
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 49 days (−0.7)
Fils A.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
3.5Hard Elo 1849
Surface ELO
6.5+81 Hard Elo edge
3.0Overall Elo 1902
ELO gap
7.0Overall Elo 2001
5.0
H2H
5.0
4.1
Surface form
6.7
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Rublev A.Fils A.
Freshness·Even
94
90

Rublev A.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Fils A.: 10 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Rublev A.[1]
Ruusuvuori E.
6-46-4
Muller A.
Nishikori K.
2-66-16-3
Semi-finals
Rublev A.[1]
Shang J.
4-66-26-3
Ruusuvuori E.
Ofner S.
4-67-56-3
Nishikori K.
Shang J.
4-3
Muller A.
Munar J.
4-67-656-4
Quarter-finals
Rublev A.[1]
Fils A.[8]
6-41-66-2
Shang J.
Tiafoe F.[3]
6-46-4
Ofner S.
Bautista Agut R.
6-46-4
Ruusuvuori E.
Kotov P.
6-37-64
Shang J.
Marozsan F.
1-66-36-4
Nishikori K.
Norrie C.
6-33-66-2
Muller A.
Fils A.[4]
3-66-36-1
Munar J.
Musetti L.[2]
2-67-647-5
R16
Rublev A.[1]
Broady L.
6-47-68
Shang J.
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-757-627-62
Ofner S.
Struff J.[5]
6-747-657-62
Kotov P.
Musetti L.[6]
6-46-3
Tiafoe F.[3]
Kecmanovic M.
6-37-64
Fils A.[8]
Huesler M.
7-57-5
Ruusuvuori E.
Khachanov K.[2]
7-622-66-2
Bautista Agut R.
Cerundolo F.[4]
7-56-3
Shang J.
Martinez P.[7]
6-36-1
Fils A.[4]
Bergs Z.
7-676-4
Musetti L.[2]
Diallo G.
6-46-3
Marozsan F.
Rublev A.[1]
7-53-66-3
Nishikori K.
Khachanov K.[3]
4-66-37-5
Norrie C.
Sonego L.
6-24-66-1
Munar J.
Borges N.[5]
6-37-5
Muller A.
Kecmanovic M.
5-77-667-610
R32
Musetti L.
Wong C.
6-47-5
Fils A.[8]
Gojo B.
6-34-66-1
Huesler M.
Sachko V.
6-46-4
Shang J.
Djere L.[7]
6-756-37-68
Bautista Agut R.
Marozsan F.
6-26-3
Ofner S.
Mcdonald M.
6-16-2
Musetti L.[6]
Wong C.
6-47-5
Kotov P.
Borges N.
6-26-4
Broady L.
Cachin P.
6-46-0
Struff J.[5]
Cilic M.
3-67-647-67
Ruusuvuori E.
Bonzi B.
6-756-26-1
Kecmanovic M.
Daniel T.
6-36-2
Van De Zandschulp B.
Mochizuki S.
7-56-1
Nishikori K.
Shapovalov D.
6-26-3
Muller A.
Huesler M.
2-66-46-3
Bergs Z.
Moro Canas A.
6-46-4
Borges N.[5]
Yunchaokete B.
3-66-37-66
Munar J.
Davidovich Fokina A.
4-66-36-3
Diallo G.
Carballes Baena R.
4-67-647-5
Marozsan F.
Safiullin R.
6-17-69
Kecmanovic M.
Darderi L.[8]
6-36-3
Shang J.
Wong C.
7-636-4
Norrie C.
Tien L.
6-37-5
Sonego L.
Nakashima B.[6]
7-646-3
Martinez P.[7]
Passaro F.
6-46-4