Cem Ilkel vs Sebastian Fanselow — Oeiras 1 CH Round of 32

Oeiras 1 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Cem Ilkel
TUR3
Cem Ilkel
#1462ATP
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 1 January 2024
hard
GER
Sebastian Fanselow
#1187ATP
34 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLWLW
Ilkel C.
6-3 3-6 7-5
Fanselow S.
Ilkel C.
6372
Fanselow S.
3651

Cem Ilkel defeated Sebastian Fanselow 6-3 3-6 7-5 in the Oeiras 1 CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Cem Ilkel closed it out in three sets, 6–3 3–6 7–5.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ilkel C.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Fanselow S.

Fanselow S.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Ilkel C.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ilkel C.Fanselow S.
1st serve in·Even
56%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
48%
Service points won·Even
60%
58%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
57%
55%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.5
2.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.3
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (35 vs 51). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ilkel C.Fanselow S.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
32
4
Break points saved·Clear edge
49
31
Break points won·Even
3
5
Deciding sets·Dominant
70
22
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
66
51

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ilkel C.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Fanselow S.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.3
Surface form
6.0
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Surface transition
6.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Kasnikowski M.
Elias G.
7-614-66-3
Semi-finals
Kasnikowski M.
Royer V.
6-46-4
Elias G.
Gerasimov E.
6-43-66-3
Quarter-finals
Elias G.
Faria J.
6-23-66-4
Gerasimov E.
Kwiatkowski T.
6-726-36-4
Royer V.
Lamasine T.
6-46-3
Kasnikowski M.
Sousa J.[2]
7-616-4
R16
Royer V.
Gray A.
6-716-16-3
Kasnikowski M.
Domingues J.
7-56-4
Faria J.
Ursu V.
6-36-4
Lamasine T.
Clarke J.
1-66-46-4
Sousa J.[2]
Jubb P.
7-666-4
Gerasimov E.
Bourgue M.[7]
6-42-66-4
Kwiatkowski T.
Giustino L.
6-46-4
Elias G.
Ilkel C.[3]
6-46-2
R32
Lamasine T.
Janvier M.[4]
7-630-0
Gerasimov E.
Pereira T.
7-656-1
Gray A.
Debru G.
6-46-1
Clarke J.
Mayo A.
6-37-62
Giustino L.
Vrbensky M.
7-54-66-4
Kwiatkowski T.
Rocha H.[1]
6-46-4
Faria J.
Geerts M.[8]
7-666-2
Ursu V.
Quinn E.
6-47-5
Bourgue M.[7]
Kodat T.
6-36-1
Elias G.
De Schepper K.
6-46-4
Ilkel C.[3]
Fanselow S.
6-33-67-5
Royer V.
Broom C.
6-36-716-3
Kasnikowski M.
Andreev A.[5]
3-67-6106-3
Domingues J.
Rubin N.
6-41-67-5
Jubb P.
Alvarez Varona N.
7-56-2
Sousa J.[2]
Vincent Ruggeri S.
6-46-2