Li Tu vs Francisco Comesana — Brisbane Qualifying Round 1

Brisbane · ATP · Qualifying Round 1
AUS
Li Tu
#464ATP
1488ELO
1471Hard ELO
30 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 1 January 2024
hard
Francisco Comesana
ARG10
Francisco Comesana
#94ATP
1695ELO
1642Hard ELO
$580kYTD
$2.5MCAREER
25 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWWLWW
Tu L.
7-6 5-7 7-6
Comesana F.
Tu L.
775772
Comesana F.
617631

Li Tu defeated Francisco Comesana 7-6 5-7 7-6 in the Brisbane qualifying round 1 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Francisco Comesana came in ranked #94.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tu L.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Comesana F.

Comesana F.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Tu L.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Tu L.Comesana F.
—
Serve
18
—
Return
39

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Tu L.Comesana F.
1st serve in·Even
62%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
64%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
61%
60%
Aces / match·Even
6.7
6.4
Double faults / match·Even
2.8
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (125 vs 149). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tu L.Comesana F.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
27
56
Break points saved·Slight edge
82
90
Break points won·Dominant
8
36
Deciding sets·Dominant
20
79
Tiebreaks·Dominant
64
38

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tu L.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Comesana F.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Injury return: 49 days (−1.0)
Form & Matchup
3.4Hard Elo 1471
Surface ELO
6.6+171 Hard Elo edge
3.5Overall Elo 1488
ELO gap
6.5Overall Elo 1695
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.6
Surface form
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
5.5
Country comfort
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tu L.Comesana F.
Freshness·
—
90

Comesana F.: 11 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Weather
23°CRain
Wind 17 km/hHumidity 90%
Q2
Machac T.[1]
Kovacevic A.[7]
6-46-2
Duckworth J.[9]
Barrere G.[2]
6-17-62
Michelsen A.[4]
Schwartzman D.[8]
6-16-4
Tu L.
Galan D.[3]
6-37-65
Thiem D.[5]
Zeppieri G.[12]
3-66-46-4
Klein L.
Cressy M.[11]
4-67-686-4
Basavareddy N.[12]
Pouille L.[6]
6-46-4
Kukushkin M.[7]
Schoolkate T.
6-46-4
Nishioka Y.[1]
Tu L.
6-32-66-4
Hanfmann Y.[5]
Gasquet R.[9]
7-646-3
Bonzi B.[2]
Andreev A.
3-1
Gomez F.[11]
Lajovic D.[3]
6-17-64
Q1
Barrere G.[2]
Sweeny D.
6-36-0
Galan D.[3]
Kuznetsov A.
7-56-3
Cressy M.[11]
Peniston R.
6-46-4
Michelsen A.[4]
Giannessi A.
6-36-2
Zeppieri G.[12]
Jasika O.
7-56-3
Duckworth J.[9]
Sekulic P.
7-656-4
Thiem D.[5]
Mccabe J.
2-67-646-4
Tu L.
Comesana F.[10]
7-615-77-63
Schwartzman D.[8]
Bradshaw J.
6-26-4
Kovacevic A.[7]
Gaio F.
7-656-2
Klein L.
Halys Q.[6]
6-47-61
Machac T.[1]
Ellis B.
7-626-2
Bonzi B.[2]
Mccabe J.
6-36-2
Kukushkin M.[7]
Collarini A.
6-26-4
Gomez F.[11]
Blanchet U.
3-66-37-5
Andreev A.
Tseng C.[8]
6-43-67-65
Schoolkate T.
Duckworth J.[4]
6-46-4
Tu L.
Klein L.[10]
6-46-4
Pouille L.[6]
Kubler J.
4-66-37-66
Basavareddy N.[12]
Gojo B.
4-67-646-4
Lajovic D.[3]
Hoole C.
5-77-52-0
Gasquet R.[9]
Pham D.
6-16-2
Nishioka Y.[1]
Bolt A.
6-27-64
Hanfmann Y.[5]
Bradshaw J.
6-46-2