Blake Mott vs Charlie Camus — Noumea CH Qualifying Round 2

Noumea CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 2
AUS3
Blake Mott
#1565ATP
30 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 1 January 2024
hard
FRA
Charlie Camus
#1964ATP
19 yrs · 175 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLLLWW
Mott B.
1-6 7-5 6-3
Camus C.
Mott B.
1762
Camus C.
6531

Blake Mott defeated Charlie Camus 1-6 7-5 6-3 in the Noumea CH qualifying round 2 on hard. The result followed the form book — Blake Mott came in ranked #1565, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mott B.serving73% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Camus C.

Camus C.serving59% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Mott B.

Serve advantage — Mott B.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Mott B.Camus C.
1st serve in·Even
67%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
63%
57%
2nd serve points won·Even
41%
42%
Service points won·Slight edge
56%
51%
Return points won·Slight edge
40%
35%
Break points saved·Even
49%
51%
Aces / match·Even
2.3
2.8
Double faults / match·Dominant
5.3
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (23 vs 6). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mott B.
4.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 63 days (−1.2)
Camus C.
4.1
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 70 days (−1.2)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.8
Surface form
3.3
Win streak
0.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Mott B.Camus C.
Freshness·
—
100

Camus C.: 16 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Q2
Mott B.[3]
Camus C.
1-67-56-3
Statham J.[4]
Imamura M.
6-37-64
Moriya H.[2]
Puttergill C.[12]
5-76-26-0
Ochi M.[6]
Delaney J.[8]
6-36-3
Bouzige M.[9]
Fancutt T.[5]
5-77-676-2
Delaney J.
Haliak M.[1]
6-02-0
Hazawa S.[6]
Bataljin L.[7]
6-36-0
Cabral F.[12]
Delaney J.[4]
6-17-5
Branger L.[8]
Hulme M.[3]
6-36-4
Ogura K.[2]
Birrell C.[10]
7-56-4
Delaney J.[1]
Arribage T.[11]
7-51-0
Bayldon B.[9]
Loof T.[5]
6-36-2
Q1
Puttergill C.[12]
Brown P.
6-36-2
Delaney J.
Setodji T.[11]
6-03-0
Imamura M.
Rai A.[7]
6-16-4
Moriya H.[2]
Osmont G.
6-06-4
Mott B.[3]
Taylor A.
6-16-4
Bouzige M.[9]
Bayldon B.
6-26-3
Statham J.[4]
Matsui T.
6-27-63
Fancutt T.[5]
Jaloviec M.
6-24-67-5
Delaney J.[8]
Brosset S.
5-77-626-2
Cabral F.[12]
Arcon A.
6-16-2
Branger L.[8]
Taylor A.
6-06-2
Bayldon B.[9]
Osmont G.
6-26-1