Matias Soto vs Facundo Mena — Temuco CH Round of 32

Temuco CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
CHI
Matias Soto
#249ATP
1421ELO
1323Hard ELO
27 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 27 November 2023
hard
Facundo Mena
ARG
Facundo Mena
#331ATP
1427ELO
1355Hard ELO
33 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWLWLL
Soto M.
6-4 6-3
Mena F.
Soto M.
662
Mena F.
430

Matias Soto defeated Facundo Mena 6-4 6-3 in the Temuco CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Matias Soto closed it out in two sets, 6–4 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Soto M.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Mena F.

Mena F.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Soto M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Soto M.Mena F.
1st serve in·Even
57%
56%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Even
61%
62%
Return points won·Even
39%
39%
Break points saved·Even
58%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.2
5.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.6
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (130 vs 145). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Soto M.Mena F.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
34
9
Break points saved·Slight edge
51
57
Break points won·Slight edge
14
7
Deciding sets·Dominant
68
28
Tiebreaks·Dominant
56
10

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Soto M.
4.3
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 63 days (−1.2)
Mena F.
4.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 56 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
4.9Hard Elo 1323
Surface ELO
5.1+32 Hard Elo edge
5.5Overall Elo 1421
ELO gap
4.5Overall Elo 1427
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
1.4
Fatigue & Travel
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Soto M.Mena F.
Freshness·Clear edge
56
70

Soto M.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 120 games (7d) · Mena F.: 4 days rest · 3 matches, 88 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Kovacevic A.[4]
Soares Klier Junior G.
4-66-36-3
Semi-finals
Soares Klier Junior G.
Barrios Vera T.[1]
6-46-3
Kovacevic A.[4]
Vacherot V.
6-746-06-3
Quarter-finals
Vacherot V.
Ayeni O.
6-22-66-4
Barrios Vera T.[1]
Bicknell B.
6-47-67
Soares Klier Junior G.
Sakamoto P.
6-06-3
Kovacevic A.[4]
Rodriguez Taverna S.[6]
6-36-2
R16
Vacherot V.
Heide G.[7]
1-66-46-2
Sakamoto P.
Reis Da Silva J.
6-44-66-2
Rodriguez Taverna S.[6]
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
3-67-686-1
Soares Klier Junior G.
Buse I.
6-47-66
Bicknell B.
Smith K.
6-36-0
Barrios Vera T.[1]
Soto M.
7-646-4
Ayeni O.
Huertas Del Pino C.
3-66-06-3
Kovacevic A.[4]
Villanueva G.
6-47-65
R32
Kovacevic A.[4]
Gomez F.
6-747-647-62
Smith K.
Andreozzi G.[5]
3-67-647-5
Huertas Del Pino C.
Andrade A.
3-67-56-2
Ayeni O.
Franco Descotte M.
4-66-36-2
Vacherot V.
Kestelboim M.
7-56-2
Heide G.[7]
Paz J.
6-36-3
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Kuzuhara B.
3-66-36-3
Rodriguez Taverna S.[6]
Alves M.
6-757-656-4
Sakamoto P.
Ficovich J.[8]
5-77-656-4
Reis Da Silva J.
Lama G.
6-26-1
Buse I.
Dellien H.[3]
1-67-636-4
Bicknell B.
Decamps G.
6-766-47-64
Soto M.
Mena F.
6-46-3
Villanueva G.
Statham J.
6-36-3
Soares Klier Junior G.
Lock B.
6-36-2
Barrios Vera T.[1]
Fernandez Flores D.
6-16-2