Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva vs Gonzalo Lama — Temuco CH Round of 32

Temuco CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
BRA
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
#250ATP
1486ELO
1359Hard ELO
$76kYTD
$371kCAREER
26 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 27 November 2023
hard
CHI
Gonzalo Lama
33 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLWLLW
Reis Da Silva J.
6-2 6-1
Lama G.
Reis Da Silva J.
662
Lama G.
210

Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva defeated Gonzalo Lama 6-2 6-1 in the Temuco CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva came in defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Reis Da Silva J.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Lama G.

Lama G.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Reis Da Silva J.

Serve advantage — Reis Da Silva J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Reis Da Silva J.Lama G.
1st serve in·Even
64%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
51%
Service points won·Even
60%
60%
Return points won·Slight edge
41%
35%
Break points saved·Even
58%
62%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.1
3.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.1
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 38). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Reis Da Silva J.Lama G.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
12
35
Break points saved·Dominant
49
75
Break points won·Dominant
43
0
Deciding sets·Dominant
9
87
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
17
2

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Reis Da Silva J.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Lama G.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.3
Surface form
3.2
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.4
Minutes 14d
7.5
6.0
Prev. match
8.0
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Kovacevic A.[4]
Soares Klier Junior G.
4-66-36-3
Semi-finals
Soares Klier Junior G.
Barrios Vera T.[1]
6-46-3
Kovacevic A.[4]
Vacherot V.
6-746-06-3
Quarter-finals
Vacherot V.
Ayeni O.
6-22-66-4
Barrios Vera T.[1]
Bicknell B.
6-47-67
Soares Klier Junior G.
Sakamoto P.
6-06-3
Kovacevic A.[4]
Rodriguez Taverna S.[6]
6-36-2
R16
Vacherot V.
Heide G.[7]
1-66-46-2
Sakamoto P.
Reis Da Silva J.
6-44-66-2
Rodriguez Taverna S.[6]
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
3-67-686-1
Soares Klier Junior G.
Buse I.
6-47-66
Bicknell B.
Smith K.
6-36-0
Barrios Vera T.[1]
Soto M.
7-646-4
Ayeni O.
Huertas Del Pino C.
3-66-06-3
Kovacevic A.[4]
Villanueva G.
6-47-65
R32
Kovacevic A.[4]
Gomez F.
6-747-647-62
Smith K.
Andreozzi G.[5]
3-67-647-5
Huertas Del Pino C.
Andrade A.
3-67-56-2
Ayeni O.
Franco Descotte M.
4-66-36-2
Vacherot V.
Kestelboim M.
7-56-2
Heide G.[7]
Paz J.
6-36-3
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Kuzuhara B.
3-66-36-3
Rodriguez Taverna S.[6]
Alves M.
6-757-656-4
Sakamoto P.
Ficovich J.[8]
5-77-656-4
Reis Da Silva J.
Lama G.
6-26-1
Buse I.
Dellien H.[3]
1-67-636-4
Bicknell B.
Decamps G.
6-766-47-64
Soto M.
Mena F.
6-46-3
Villanueva G.
Statham J.
6-36-3
Soares Klier Junior G.
Lock B.
6-36-2
Barrios Vera T.[1]
Fernandez Flores D.
6-16-2