Ivan Gakhov vs Edoardo Lavagno — Maspalomas CH Round of 32

Maspalomas CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Ivan Gakhov
RUS4
Ivan Gakhov
#388ATP
1430ELO
1384Clay ELO
29 yrs · 191 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 27 November 2023
clay
ITA
Edoardo Lavagno
27 yrs · 185 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
Gakhov I.
7-5 7-6
Lavagno E.
Gakhov I.
7772
Lavagno E.
5640

Ivan Gakhov defeated Edoardo Lavagno 7-5 7-6 in the Maspalomas CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Edoardo Lavagno came in defending last year's round of 32, but Ivan Gakhov had been the form player, winning 2 of their last 7 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gakhov I.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Lavagno E.

Lavagno E.serving66% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Gakhov I.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gakhov I.Lavagno E.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
67%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
70%
61%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
47%
Service points won·Even
61%
57%
Return points won·Slight edge
37%
42%
Break points saved·Even
62%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.0
1.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.5
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (187 vs 79). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gakhov I.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Lavagno E.
4.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
4.0
Surface form
4.3
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.4
Minutes 14d
9.0
9.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Martinez P.[1]
Feldbausch K.
6-44-66-3
Semi-finals
Feldbausch K.
Rincon D.[7]
6-36-1
Martinez P.[1]
Misolic F.[3]
3-66-36-4
Quarter-finals
Martinez P.[1]
Gulin S.
6-46-4
Feldbausch K.
Lopez Morillo I.
6-26-2
Rincon D.[7]
Forejtek J.
3-66-46-4
Misolic F.[3]
Andreev A.
6-36-3
R16
Gulin S.
Brancaccio R.[6]
7-54-66-3
Feldbausch K.
Krutykh O.
3-66-36-1
Misolic F.[3]
Campana Lee G.
4-66-46-3
Rincon D.[7]
Stodder T.
7-56-3
Andreev A.
Jorda Sanchis D.
6-37-65
Forejtek J.
Gakhov I.[4]
2-66-46-3
Lopez Morillo I.
Nagal S.[2]
3-66-47-5
Martinez P.[1]
Gaubas V.
6-36-1
R32
Stodder T.
Neumayer L.
6-36-3
Lopez Morillo I.
Barranco Cosano J.
7-56-4
Gulin S.
Fatic N.
6-43-2
Feldbausch K.
Alvarez Varona N.
4-2
Forejtek J.
Barroso Campos A.
6-24-66-4
Jorda Sanchis D.
Sanchez Jover C.
6-16-3
Campana Lee G.
Giustino L.
4-66-16-3
Nagal S.[2]
Moro Canas A.
6-06-2
Krutykh O.
Molleker R.[8]
4-66-46-2
Gakhov I.[4]
Lavagno E.
7-57-64
Rincon D.[7]
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
6-27-5
Andreev A.
Roca Batalla O.[5]
6-47-63
Misolic F.[3]
Squire H.
6-36-4
Martinez P.[1]
Ionel N.
6-16-2
Brancaccio R.[6]
Diez S.
6-46-2
Gaubas V.
Lopez Montagud C.
2-67-676-4