Fabio Fognini vs Albert Ramos — Valencia CH Semi-final

Valencia CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
ITA8
Fabio Fognini
39 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 20 November 2023
clay
ESP3
Albert Ramos
1558ELO
1526Clay ELO
38 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLLLL
Fognini F.
6-4 6-1
Ramos A.
Fognini F.
662
Ramos A.
410

Fabio Fognini defeated Albert Ramos 6-4 6-1 in the Valencia CH semi-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Fabio Fognini came in leading the head-to-head 10–3. Fabio Fognini extended the head-to-head to 11–3.

Key context

Head to head

10–3
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-07-17GstaadR32clayAlbert Ramos6-1 2-6 6-2
2022-08-15Cincinnati MastersR64hardFabio Fognini6-2 6-3
2021-06-28WimbledonR128grassFabio Fognini7-6(4) 6-2 6-4
2017-02-20Rio de JaneiroR16clayAlbert Ramos6-2 6-3
2016-10-24ViennaR32hardAlbert Ramos6-2 6-2
2016-10-17MoscowQFhardFabio Fognini6-2 6-2
2016-10-10Shanghai MastersR64hardFabio Fognini7-5 6-3
2015-07-27HamburgR16clayFabio Fognini6-2 3-6 6-3
2014-10-20ValenciaR32hardFabio Fognini6-4 6-2
2013-07-15HamburgR32clayFabio Fognini6-1 6-3
2013-04-14Monte Carlo MastersR32clayFabio Fognini6-3 7-5
2012-06-18EastbourneR32grassFabio Fognini7-6(2) 6-7(3) 6-2
2011-01-31SantiagoR16clayFabio Fognini3-6 7-5 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Fognini F.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Ramos A.

Ramos A.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Fognini F.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Fognini F.Ramos A.
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
51%
Service points won·Even
59%
60%
Return points won·Even
40%
38%
Break points saved·Even
57%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.8
2.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.8
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (133 vs 158). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Fognini F.Ramos A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
87
59
Break points saved·Even
93
95
Break points won·Dominant
81
49
Deciding sets·Clear edge
93
80
Tiebreaks·Dominant
92
22

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Fognini F.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Ramos A.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
0.0
H2H
10.0
6.0
Surface form
7.1
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
5.5
Minutes 14d
7.3
7.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Fognini F.[8]
Bautista Agut R.[1]
3-67-687-63
Semi-finals
Fognini F.[8]
Ramos A.[3]
6-46-1
Bautista Agut R.[1]
Yevseyev D.
6-36-1
Quarter-finals
Fognini F.[8]
Herbert P.
6-47-5
Yevseyev D.
Landaluce M.
7-667-62
Ramos A.[3]
Gaston H.[5]
6-26-4
Bautista Agut R.[1]
Moro Canas A.
6-27-5
R16
Fognini F.[8]
Kovalik J.
6-14-66-3
Yevseyev D.
Martinez P.[7]
W/O
Gaston H.[5]
Brancaccio R.
6-47-65
Landaluce M.
Rincon D.
6-46-4
Moro Canas A.
Molleker R.
6-46-4
Bautista Agut R.[1]
Pellegrino A.
7-56-3
Ramos A.[3]
Giannessi A.
6-10-67-63
Herbert P.
Andreev A.
6-16-2
R32
Ramos A.[3]
Trungelliti M.
6-27-611
Herbert P.
Moutet C.
3-66-46-1
Kovalik J.
Roca Batalla O.
6-746-37-64
Giannessi A.
Damas M.
6-26-4
Rincon D.
Lopez Montagud C.
7-56-4
Molleker R.
Molcan A.[6]
6-47-5
Andreev A.
Krutykh O.
2-66-27-65
Brancaccio R.
Caruso S.
6-16-4
Landaluce M.
Andujar P.
6-36-2
Pellegrino A.
Gakhov I.
6-36-1
Bautista Agut R.[1]
Vavassori A.
6-36-4
Yevseyev D.
Taberner C.
7-57-62
Martinez P.[7]
Ymer E.
6-13-66-1
Gaston H.[5]
Mayot H.
6-16-1
Fognini F.[8]
Bonadio R.
2-67-56-1
Moro Canas A.
Nagal S.
6-46-3