Nino Serdarusic vs Beibit Zhukayev — Champaign CH Round of 16

Champaign CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
CRO
Nino Serdarusic
#1471ATP
29 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 13 November 2023
hard
KAZ6
Beibit Zhukayev
#387ATP
1455ELO
1402Hard ELO
25 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWLWWL
Serdarusic N.
7-6 6-4
Zhukayev B.
Serdarusic N.
7762
Zhukayev B.
6540

Nino Serdarusic defeated Beibit Zhukayev 7-6 6-4 in the Champaign CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Serdarusic N.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Zhukayev B.

Zhukayev B.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Serdarusic N.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Serdarusic N.Zhukayev B.
1st serve in·Even
63%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
70%
77%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
66%
Return points won·Even
36%
33%
Break points saved·Slight edge
58%
66%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.5
11.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.6
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (93 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Serdarusic N.Zhukayev B.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
8
31
Break points saved·Dominant
66
94
Break points won·Even
5
1
Deciding sets·Clear edge
10
25
Tiebreaks·Dominant
23
63

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Serdarusic N.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Zhukayev B.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
2.5
Surface form
7.3
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.2
Minutes 14d
3.3
4.0
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Kypson P.[7]
Michelsen A.[2]
6-46-3
Semi-finals
Michelsen A.[2]
Droguet T.[4]
2-66-46-3
Kypson P.[7]
Quinn E.
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Michelsen A.[2]
Damm M.[8]
6-11-66-4
Kypson P.[7]
Kovacevic A.[1]
7-624-66-3
Quinn E.
Serdarusic N.
6-36-3
Droguet T.[4]
Krueger M.
6-46-1
R16
Quinn E.
Kirchheimer S.
6-16-4
Damm M.[8]
Rosenkranz M.
6-36-4
Serdarusic N.
Zhukayev B.[6]
7-656-4
Kypson P.[7]
Miyoshi K.
6-36-1
Michelsen A.[2]
Fanselow S.
6-36-2
Droguet T.[4]
Holt B.
6-46-3
Kovacevic A.[1]
Ozolins K.
7-656-3
Krueger M.
Rybakov A.
7-656-1
R32
Zhukayev B.[6]
Dalla Valle E.
6-16-1
Holt B.
Montes De La Torre I.
5-76-06-1
Rybakov A.
Rodesch C.
5-76-46-4
Kypson P.[7]
Whitehouse M.
6-17-65
Kovacevic A.[1]
Williams C.
6-32-66-4
Kirchheimer S.
Karlovskiy E.
7-55-4
Krueger M.
Kudla D.[5]
6-747-50-0
Rosenkranz M.
Debru G.
7-673-67-64
Droguet T.[4]
Durasovic V.
6-26-3
Fanselow S.
Mchugh A.
6-24-66-3
Ozolins K.
Kozlov S.
2-66-36-4
Miyoshi K.
Heck H.
6-36-4
Quinn E.
Nava E.[3]
6-36-2
Michelsen A.[2]
Tomic B.
6-46-0
Damm M.[8]
Perez A.
7-636-4
Serdarusic N.
Mayo A.
6-31-66-3