Mitchell Krueger vs Alex Rybakov — Champaign CH Round of 16

Champaign CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Mitchell Krueger
USA
Mitchell Krueger
#364ATP
1461ELO
1436Hard ELO
32 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 13 November 2023
hard
Alex Rybakov
USA
Alex Rybakov
#428ATP
1352ELO
1310Hard ELO
29 yrs · 185 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLWLWLL
Krueger M.
7-6 6-1
Rybakov A.
Krueger M.
7762
Rybakov A.
6510

Mitchell Krueger defeated Alex Rybakov 7-6 6-1 in the Champaign CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Mitchell Krueger came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 7–6 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Krueger M.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Rybakov A.

Rybakov A.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Krueger M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Krueger M.Rybakov A.
1st serve in·Even
64%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
63%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Even
60%
63%
Aces / match·Even
4.5
4.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.0
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 113). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Krueger M.Rybakov A.
Clutch Rating·Even
16
15
Break points saved·Even
87
84
Break points won·Slight edge
14
5
Deciding sets·Slight edge
13
19
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
0
5

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Krueger M.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Rybakov A.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.9+126 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.1Hard Elo 1310
6.8Overall Elo 1461
ELO gap
3.2Overall Elo 1352
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
3.4
Surface form
3.6
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.9
Minutes 14d
7.9
7.0
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Krueger M.Rybakov A.
Freshness·Clear edge
100
86

Krueger M.: 15 days rest · Rybakov A.: 6 days rest · 1 match, 28 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Kypson P.[7]
Michelsen A.[2]
6-46-3
Semi-finals
Michelsen A.[2]
Droguet T.[4]
2-66-46-3
Kypson P.[7]
Quinn E.
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Michelsen A.[2]
Damm M.[8]
6-11-66-4
Kypson P.[7]
Kovacevic A.[1]
7-624-66-3
Quinn E.
Serdarusic N.
6-36-3
Droguet T.[4]
Krueger M.
6-46-1
R16
Quinn E.
Kirchheimer S.
6-16-4
Damm M.[8]
Rosenkranz M.
6-36-4
Serdarusic N.
Zhukayev B.[6]
7-656-4
Kypson P.[7]
Miyoshi K.
6-36-1
Michelsen A.[2]
Fanselow S.
6-36-2
Droguet T.[4]
Holt B.
6-46-3
Kovacevic A.[1]
Ozolins K.
7-656-3
Krueger M.
Rybakov A.
7-656-1
R32
Zhukayev B.[6]
Dalla Valle E.
6-16-1
Holt B.
Montes De La Torre I.
5-76-06-1
Rybakov A.
Rodesch C.
5-76-46-4
Kypson P.[7]
Whitehouse M.
6-17-65
Kovacevic A.[1]
Williams C.
6-32-66-4
Kirchheimer S.
Karlovskiy E.
7-55-4
Krueger M.
Kudla D.[5]
6-747-50-0
Rosenkranz M.
Debru G.
7-673-67-64
Droguet T.[4]
Durasovic V.
6-26-3
Fanselow S.
Mchugh A.
6-24-66-3
Ozolins K.
Kozlov S.
2-66-36-4
Miyoshi K.
Heck H.
6-36-4
Quinn E.
Nava E.[3]
6-36-2
Michelsen A.[2]
Tomic B.
6-46-0
Damm M.[8]
Perez A.
7-636-4
Serdarusic N.
Mayo A.
6-31-66-3