Li Tu vs Alexis Galarneau — Drummondville CH Round of 16

Drummondville CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
AUS
Li Tu
#464ATP
1488ELO
1471Hard ELO
30 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 13 November 2023
hard
Alexis Galarneau
CAN7
Alexis Galarneau
#158ATP
1593ELO
1548Hard ELO
$166kYTD
$825kCAREER
27 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWLWWL
Tu L.
7-6 6-2
Galarneau A.
Tu L.
7762
Galarneau A.
6520

Li Tu defeated Alexis Galarneau 7-6 6-2 in the Drummondville CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Alexis Galarneau came in ranked #158, defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

  • Match story: Li Tu closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tu L.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Galarneau A.

Galarneau A.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Tu L.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tu L.Galarneau A.
1st serve in·Even
61%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
64%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
40%
Break points saved·Even
60%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.2
3.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.7
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (184 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tu L.Galarneau A.
Clutch Rating·Even
27
28
Break points saved·Even
82
79
Break points won·Slight edge
8
16
Deciding sets·Even
20
22
Tiebreaks·Even
64
61

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tu L.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
Galarneau A.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
4.2Hard Elo 1471
Surface ELO
5.8+77 Hard Elo edge
4.2Overall Elo 1488
ELO gap
5.8Overall Elo 1593
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.1
Surface form
5.4
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.4
Minutes 14d
Context
5.0
Defending pts
7.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tu L.Galarneau A.
Freshness·
—
53

Galarneau A.: 2 days rest · 4 matches, 113 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Bergs Z.[6]
Duckworth J.[2]
6-47-5
Semi-finals
Bergs Z.[6]
Vrbensky M.
W/O
Duckworth J.[2]
Tu L.
6-46-3
Quarter-finals
Duckworth J.[2]
Peniston R.[5]
4-66-36-4
Tu L.
Sousa J.
6-47-5
Bergs Z.[6]
Koepfer D.[1]
6-44-67-5
Vrbensky M.
Dougaz A.[8]
6-23-66-4
R16
Peniston R.[5]
Martin D.
6-20-0
Tu L.
Galarneau A.[7]
7-656-2
Dougaz A.[8]
Broom C.
3-66-46-1
Koepfer D.[1]
Pieczkowski O.
6-46-4
Duckworth J.[2]
Kwiatkowski T.
6-16-736-3
Vrbensky M.
Draxl L.
6-746-37-5
Bergs Z.[6]
George B.
6-36-2
Sousa J.
Paire B.[3]
6-17-64
R32
Martin D.
Kotzen A.
2-1
Duckworth J.[2]
Kingsley C.
7-56-727-65
Koepfer D.[1]
Wiedenmann L.
5-76-26-2
Broom C.
Boulais J.
7-644-66-2
Kwiatkowski T.
Hussey G.
7-640-67-5
Peniston R.[5]
Pannu K.
6-36-1
Sousa J.
Samuel T.
3-66-06-3
Tu L.
Janvier M.
4-67-636-3
Galarneau A.[7]
Jorda Sanchis D.
6-33-66-4
Vrbensky M.
Markes C.
6-43-66-3
George B.
Lock B.
6-17-5
Paire B.[3]
Aguilar J.
6-36-4
Dougaz A.[8]
Kasnikowski M.
6-43-67-5
Draxl L.
Diez S.
6-46-776-1
Pieczkowski O.
Paulson A.
4-66-36-1
Bergs Z.[6]
Saville L.
6-16-1