James Duckworth vs Li Tu — Drummondville CH Semi-final

Drummondville CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
James Duckworth
AUS2
James Duckworth
#74ATP
1628ELO
1592Hard ELO
$485kYTD
$5.4MCAREER
34 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLWLWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 13 November 2023
hard
AUS
Li Tu
#464ATP
1488ELO
1471Hard ELO
30 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
Duckworth J.
6-4 6-3
Tu L.
Duckworth J.
662
Tu L.
430

James Duckworth defeated Li Tu 6-4 6-3 in the Drummondville CH semi-final on hard. The result followed the form book — James Duckworth came in ranked #74. James Duckworth claimed a first win over Li Tu in four meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 3–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–3
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-08-07Cincinnati MastersQ1hardLi Tu7-6(4) 6-4
2025-03-05Indian Wells MastersQ2hardLi Tu6-4 6-2
2025-01-06AdelaideR32hardLi Tu6-1 7-5

Serve vs return

This season
Duckworth J.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Tu L.

Tu L.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Duckworth J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Duckworth J.Tu L.
25
Serve
—
23
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Duckworth J.Tu L.
1st serve in·Even
58%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
76%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
55%
51%
Service points won·Even
67%
64%
Return points won·Even
36%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
7.3
6.2
Double faults / match·Even
2.6
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 184). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Duckworth J.Tu L.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
55
27
Break points saved·Clear edge
97
82
Break points won·Even
4
8
Deciding sets·Dominant
78
20
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
72
64

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Duckworth J.
7.7
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Tu L.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.4+121 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.6Hard Elo 1471
6.5Overall Elo 1628
ELO gap
3.5Overall Elo 1488
7.2
H2H
2.8
8.5
Surface form
4.1
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.7
Minutes 14d
9.4
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Duckworth J.Tu L.
Freshness·
89
—

Duckworth J.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Bergs Z.[6]
Duckworth J.[2]
6-47-5
Semi-finals
Bergs Z.[6]
Vrbensky M.
W/O
Duckworth J.[2]
Tu L.
6-46-3
Quarter-finals
Duckworth J.[2]
Peniston R.[5]
4-66-36-4
Tu L.
Sousa J.
6-47-5
Bergs Z.[6]
Koepfer D.[1]
6-44-67-5
Vrbensky M.
Dougaz A.[8]
6-23-66-4
R16
Peniston R.[5]
Martin D.
6-20-0
Tu L.
Galarneau A.[7]
7-656-2
Dougaz A.[8]
Broom C.
3-66-46-1
Koepfer D.[1]
Pieczkowski O.
6-46-4
Duckworth J.[2]
Kwiatkowski T.
6-16-736-3
Vrbensky M.
Draxl L.
6-746-37-5
Bergs Z.[6]
George B.
6-36-2
Sousa J.
Paire B.[3]
6-17-64
R32
Martin D.
Kotzen A.
2-1
Duckworth J.[2]
Kingsley C.
7-56-727-65
Koepfer D.[1]
Wiedenmann L.
5-76-26-2
Broom C.
Boulais J.
7-644-66-2
Kwiatkowski T.
Hussey G.
7-640-67-5
Peniston R.[5]
Pannu K.
6-36-1
Sousa J.
Samuel T.
3-66-06-3
Tu L.
Janvier M.
4-67-636-3
Galarneau A.[7]
Jorda Sanchis D.
6-33-66-4
Vrbensky M.
Markes C.
6-43-66-3
George B.
Lock B.
6-17-5
Paire B.[3]
Aguilar J.
6-36-4
Dougaz A.[8]
Kasnikowski M.
6-43-67-5
Draxl L.
Diez S.
6-46-776-1
Pieczkowski O.
Paulson A.
4-66-36-1
Bergs Z.[6]
Saville L.
6-16-1