Titouan Droguet vs Brandon Holt — Champaign CH Round of 16

Champaign CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Titouan Droguet
FRA4
Titouan Droguet
#119ATP
1717ELO
1650Hard ELO
$273kYTD
$1.1MCAREER
25 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 13 November 2023
hard
USA
Brandon Holt
#657ATP
1537ELO
1507Hard ELO
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLWW
Droguet T.
6-4 6-3
Holt B.
Droguet T.
662
Holt B.
430

Titouan Droguet defeated Brandon Holt 6-4 6-3 in the Champaign CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Titouan Droguet came in ranked #119.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Droguet T.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Holt B.

Holt B.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Droguet T.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Droguet T.Holt B.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
66%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
51%
Service points won·Even
65%
63%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Even
60%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.7
4.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.0
1.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 189). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Droguet T.Holt B.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
64
58
Break points saved·Even
88
85
Break points won·Clear edge
17
31
Deciding sets·Clear edge
93
79
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
86
69

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Droguet T.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Holt B.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.8+143 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.2Hard Elo 1507
7.2Overall Elo 1717
ELO gap
2.8Overall Elo 1537
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.5
Surface form
5.1
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.9
Minutes 14d
5.4
7.0
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Droguet T.Holt B.
Freshness·
65
—

Droguet T.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 100 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Kypson P.[7]
Michelsen A.[2]
6-46-3
Semi-finals
Michelsen A.[2]
Droguet T.[4]
2-66-46-3
Kypson P.[7]
Quinn E.
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Michelsen A.[2]
Damm M.[8]
6-11-66-4
Kypson P.[7]
Kovacevic A.[1]
7-624-66-3
Quinn E.
Serdarusic N.
6-36-3
Droguet T.[4]
Krueger M.
6-46-1
R16
Quinn E.
Kirchheimer S.
6-16-4
Damm M.[8]
Rosenkranz M.
6-36-4
Serdarusic N.
Zhukayev B.[6]
7-656-4
Kypson P.[7]
Miyoshi K.
6-36-1
Michelsen A.[2]
Fanselow S.
6-36-2
Droguet T.[4]
Holt B.
6-46-3
Kovacevic A.[1]
Ozolins K.
7-656-3
Krueger M.
Rybakov A.
7-656-1
R32
Zhukayev B.[6]
Dalla Valle E.
6-16-1
Holt B.
Montes De La Torre I.
5-76-06-1
Rybakov A.
Rodesch C.
5-76-46-4
Kypson P.[7]
Whitehouse M.
6-17-65
Kovacevic A.[1]
Williams C.
6-32-66-4
Kirchheimer S.
Karlovskiy E.
7-55-4
Krueger M.
Kudla D.[5]
6-747-50-0
Rosenkranz M.
Debru G.
7-673-67-64
Droguet T.[4]
Durasovic V.
6-26-3
Fanselow S.
Mchugh A.
6-24-66-3
Ozolins K.
Kozlov S.
2-66-36-4
Miyoshi K.
Heck H.
6-36-4
Quinn E.
Nava E.[3]
6-36-2
Michelsen A.[2]
Tomic B.
6-46-0
Damm M.[8]
Perez A.
7-636-4
Serdarusic N.
Mayo A.
6-31-66-3