Mats Rosenkranz vs Gabriel Debru — Champaign CH Round of 32

Champaign CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
GER
Mats Rosenkranz
#358ATP
1454ELO
1424Hard ELO
27 yrs · 193 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 13 November 2023
hard
FRA
Gabriel Debru
20 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWLWLL
Rosenkranz M.
7-6 3-6 7-6
Debru G.
Rosenkranz M.
793772
Debru G.
676641

Mats Rosenkranz defeated Gabriel Debru 7-6 3-6 7-6 in the Champaign CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Mats Rosenkranz closed it out in three sets, 7–6 3–6 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Rosenkranz M.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Debru G.

Debru G.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Rosenkranz M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Rosenkranz M.Debru G.
1st serve in·Even
61%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
75%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
48%
Service points won·Slight edge
65%
60%
Return points won·Even
36%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
63%
57%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.5
3.9
Double faults / match·Even
3.2
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (108 vs 88). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Rosenkranz M.Debru G.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
31
16
Break points saved·Dominant
86
51
Break points won·Clear edge
1
17
Deciding sets·Dominant
64
39
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
6
19

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Rosenkranz M.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Debru G.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
6.2
Surface form
4.1
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
2.7
Minutes 14d
6.7
0.0
3-set count
4.0
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Kypson P.[7]
Michelsen A.[2]
6-46-3
Semi-finals
Michelsen A.[2]
Droguet T.[4]
2-66-46-3
Kypson P.[7]
Quinn E.
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Michelsen A.[2]
Damm M.[8]
6-11-66-4
Kypson P.[7]
Kovacevic A.[1]
7-624-66-3
Quinn E.
Serdarusic N.
6-36-3
Droguet T.[4]
Krueger M.
6-46-1
R16
Quinn E.
Kirchheimer S.
6-16-4
Damm M.[8]
Rosenkranz M.
6-36-4
Serdarusic N.
Zhukayev B.[6]
7-656-4
Kypson P.[7]
Miyoshi K.
6-36-1
Michelsen A.[2]
Fanselow S.
6-36-2
Droguet T.[4]
Holt B.
6-46-3
Kovacevic A.[1]
Ozolins K.
7-656-3
Krueger M.
Rybakov A.
7-656-1
R32
Zhukayev B.[6]
Dalla Valle E.
6-16-1
Holt B.
Montes De La Torre I.
5-76-06-1
Rybakov A.
Rodesch C.
5-76-46-4
Kypson P.[7]
Whitehouse M.
6-17-65
Kovacevic A.[1]
Williams C.
6-32-66-4
Kirchheimer S.
Karlovskiy E.
7-55-4
Krueger M.
Kudla D.[5]
6-747-50-0
Rosenkranz M.
Debru G.
7-673-67-64
Droguet T.[4]
Durasovic V.
6-26-3
Fanselow S.
Mchugh A.
6-24-66-3
Ozolins K.
Kozlov S.
2-66-36-4
Miyoshi K.
Heck H.
6-36-4
Quinn E.
Nava E.[3]
6-36-2
Michelsen A.[2]
Tomic B.
6-46-0
Damm M.[8]
Perez A.
7-636-4
Serdarusic N.
Mayo A.
6-31-66-3