Martin Damm vs Alfredo Perez — Champaign CH Round of 32

Champaign CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Martin Damm
USA8
Martin Damm
#104ATP
1706ELO
1657Hard ELO
$338kYTD
$910kCAREER
22 yrs · 203 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 13 November 2023
hard
USA
Alfredo Perez
#636ATP
1372ELO
1333Hard ELO
29 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWLWLW
Damm M.
7-6 6-4
Perez A.
Damm M.
7762
Perez A.
6340

Martin Damm defeated Alfredo Perez 7-6 6-4 in the Champaign CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Martin Damm came in ranked #104.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Damm M.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Perez A.

Perez A.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Damm M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Damm M.Perez A.
1st serve in·Even
60%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
79%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
68%
63%
Return points won·Slight edge
33%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
12.5
4.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.4
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (147 vs 81). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Damm M.Perez A.
Clutch Rating·Even
26
23
Break points saved·Clear edge
93
72
Break points won·Even
1
1
Deciding sets·Dominant
5
47
Tiebreaks·Dominant
84
21

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Damm M.
7.6
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Perez A.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
8.9+323 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.1Hard Elo 1333
8.9Overall Elo 1706
ELO gap
1.1Overall Elo 1372
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.6
Surface form
5.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.3
Minutes 14d
6.7
4.0
3-set count
4.0
8.0
Prev. match
4.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Damm M.Perez A.
Freshness·
97
—

Damm M.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Kypson P.[7]
Michelsen A.[2]
6-46-3
Semi-finals
Michelsen A.[2]
Droguet T.[4]
2-66-46-3
Kypson P.[7]
Quinn E.
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Michelsen A.[2]
Damm M.[8]
6-11-66-4
Kypson P.[7]
Kovacevic A.[1]
7-624-66-3
Quinn E.
Serdarusic N.
6-36-3
Droguet T.[4]
Krueger M.
6-46-1
R16
Quinn E.
Kirchheimer S.
6-16-4
Damm M.[8]
Rosenkranz M.
6-36-4
Serdarusic N.
Zhukayev B.[6]
7-656-4
Kypson P.[7]
Miyoshi K.
6-36-1
Michelsen A.[2]
Fanselow S.
6-36-2
Droguet T.[4]
Holt B.
6-46-3
Kovacevic A.[1]
Ozolins K.
7-656-3
Krueger M.
Rybakov A.
7-656-1
R32
Zhukayev B.[6]
Dalla Valle E.
6-16-1
Holt B.
Montes De La Torre I.
5-76-06-1
Rybakov A.
Rodesch C.
5-76-46-4
Kypson P.[7]
Whitehouse M.
6-17-65
Kovacevic A.[1]
Williams C.
6-32-66-4
Kirchheimer S.
Karlovskiy E.
7-55-4
Krueger M.
Kudla D.[5]
6-747-50-0
Rosenkranz M.
Debru G.
7-673-67-64
Droguet T.[4]
Durasovic V.
6-26-3
Fanselow S.
Mchugh A.
6-24-66-3
Ozolins K.
Kozlov S.
2-66-36-4
Miyoshi K.
Heck H.
6-36-4
Quinn E.
Nava E.[3]
6-36-2
Michelsen A.[2]
Tomic B.
6-46-0
Damm M.[8]
Perez A.
7-636-4
Serdarusic N.
Mayo A.
6-31-66-3