Charles Broom vs Justin Boulais — Drummondville CH Round of 32

Drummondville CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
GBR
Charles Broom
#283ATP
1409ELO
1396Hard ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLWWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 13 November 2023
hard
Justin Boulais
CAN
Justin Boulais
#422ATP
1352ELO
1326Hard ELO
24 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLWLWWWWW
Broom C.
7-6 4-6 6-2
Boulais J.
Broom C.
77462
Boulais J.
64621

Charles Broom defeated Justin Boulais 7-6 4-6 6-2 in the Drummondville CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Charles Broom came in ranked #283, defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

  • Match story: Charles Broom closed it out in three sets, 7–6 4–6 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Broom C.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Boulais J.

Boulais J.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Broom C.

Serve advantage — Broom C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Broom C.Boulais J.
1st serve in·Even
63%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
48%
Service points won·Even
63%
60%
Return points won·Even
39%
39%
Break points saved·Even
58%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.4
3.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.9
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (117 vs 69). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Broom C.Boulais J.
Clutch Rating·Even
10
8
Break points saved·Slight edge
56
50
Break points won·Slight edge
0
5
Deciding sets·Clear edge
36
13
Tiebreaks·Dominant
10
49

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Broom C.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Boulais J.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.5+70 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.5Hard Elo 1326
7.6Overall Elo 1409
ELO gap
2.4Overall Elo 1352
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.6
Surface form
1.6
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0Lost last 6
Fatigue & Travel
9.3
Minutes 14d
9.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
7.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Broom C.Boulais J.
Freshness·Slight edge
77
84

Broom C.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 30 games (7d) · Boulais J.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 21 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Bergs Z.[6]
Duckworth J.[2]
6-47-5
Semi-finals
Bergs Z.[6]
Vrbensky M.
W/O
Duckworth J.[2]
Tu L.
6-46-3
Quarter-finals
Duckworth J.[2]
Peniston R.[5]
4-66-36-4
Tu L.
Sousa J.
6-47-5
Bergs Z.[6]
Koepfer D.[1]
6-44-67-5
Vrbensky M.
Dougaz A.[8]
6-23-66-4
R16
Peniston R.[5]
Martin D.
6-20-0
Tu L.
Galarneau A.[7]
7-656-2
Dougaz A.[8]
Broom C.
3-66-46-1
Koepfer D.[1]
Pieczkowski O.
6-46-4
Duckworth J.[2]
Kwiatkowski T.
6-16-736-3
Vrbensky M.
Draxl L.
6-746-37-5
Bergs Z.[6]
George B.
6-36-2
Sousa J.
Paire B.[3]
6-17-64
R32
Martin D.
Kotzen A.
2-1
Duckworth J.[2]
Kingsley C.
7-56-727-65
Koepfer D.[1]
Wiedenmann L.
5-76-26-2
Broom C.
Boulais J.
7-644-66-2
Kwiatkowski T.
Hussey G.
7-640-67-5
Peniston R.[5]
Pannu K.
6-36-1
Sousa J.
Samuel T.
3-66-06-3
Tu L.
Janvier M.
4-67-636-3
Galarneau A.[7]
Jorda Sanchis D.
6-33-66-4
Vrbensky M.
Markes C.
6-43-66-3
George B.
Lock B.
6-17-5
Paire B.[3]
Aguilar J.
6-36-4
Dougaz A.[8]
Kasnikowski M.
6-43-67-5
Draxl L.
Diez S.
6-46-776-1
Pieczkowski O.
Paulson A.
4-66-36-1
Bergs Z.[6]
Saville L.
6-16-1