Alexander Blockx vs Jakub Mensik — Danderyd CH Quarter-final

Danderyd CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
BEL
Alexander Blockx
#36ATP
1906ELO
1793Hard ELO
$901kYTD
$1.8MCAREER
21 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 13 November 2023
hard
Jakub Mensik
CZE
Jakub Mensik
#18ATP
1931ELO
1893Hard ELO
$2.0MYTD
$6.9MCAREER
20 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWWWWL
Blockx A.
6-3 6-0
Mensik J.
Blockx A.
662
Mensik J.
300

Alexander Blockx defeated Jakub Mensik 6-3 6-0 in the Danderyd CH quarter-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Jakub Mensik came in ranked #18.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Blockx A.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Mensik J.

Mensik J.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Blockx A.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Blockx A.Mensik J.
53
Serve
42
42
Return
51

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Blockx A.Mensik J.
1st serve in·Even
62%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
49%
Service points won·Even
64%
65%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Even
65%
63%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.2
10.2
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.9
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (170 vs 186). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Blockx A.Mensik J.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
71
88
Break points saved·Even
97
98
Break points won·Dominant
27
77
Deciding sets·Even
95
92
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
87
99

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Blockx A.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Mensik J.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.6Hard Elo 1793
Surface ELO
6.4+100 Hard Elo edge
4.5Overall Elo 1906
ELO gap
5.5Overall Elo 1931
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.6
Surface form
4.9
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
7.8
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Blockx A.Mensik J.
Freshness·Slight edge
93
84

Blockx A.: 11 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Mensik J.: 9 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Marterer M.[2]
Nakashima B.[8]
2-66-46-3
Semi-finals
Marterer M.[2]
Cobolli F.[3]
6-26-0
Nakashima B.[8]
Blockx A.
6-16-2
Quarter-finals
Nakashima B.[8]
Goffin D.[4]
6-27-62
Blockx A.
Mensik J.
6-36-0
Marterer M.[2]
Cressy M.[6]
6-44-66-1
Cobolli F.[3]
Albot R.[7]
6-47-65
R16
Cobolli F.[3]
Onclin G.
W/O
Mensik J.
Medjedovic H.[5]
4-67-627-68
Blockx A.
Moutet C.
7-666-1
Marterer M.[2]
Fery A.
7-656-1
Cressy M.[6]
Dzumhur D.
6-36-757-5
Albot R.[7]
Krutykh O.
6-46-2
Nakashima B.[8]
Yevseyev D.
6-46-2
Goffin D.[4]
Kachmazov A.
7-57-5
R32
Fery A.
Brunold M.
6-42-66-2
Cobolli F.[3]
Bailly G.
6-46-1
Onclin G.
Borg L.
2-66-46-0
Nakashima B.[8]
Choinski J.
6-46-2
Dzumhur D.
Moller E.
6-46-1
Kachmazov A.
Riedi L.
7-622-66-4
Blockx A.
Neuchrist M.
3-66-17-63
Marterer M.[2]
Otte O.
6-36-0
Cressy M.[6]
De Loore J.
6-37-61
Albot R.[7]
Passaro F.
4-66-36-4
Yevseyev D.
Friberg K.
6-26-3
Goffin D.[4]
Moeller M.
6-36-2
Medjedovic H.[5]
Travaglia S.
6-46-3
Mensik J.
Dahlin M.
6-27-63
Moutet C.
Gaston H.[1]
2-66-46-4
Krutykh O.
Kukushkin M.
6-26-1