Tennys Sandgren vs Alexander Ritschard — Knoxville CH Quarter-final

Knoxville CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
USA
Tennys Sandgren
34 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 November 2023
hard
SUI
Alexander Ritschard
#575ATP
1528ELO
1454Hard ELO
32 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWLWWLWL
Sandgren T.
7-6 6-4
Ritschard A.
Sandgren T.
71162
Ritschard A.
6940

Tennys Sandgren defeated Alexander Ritschard 7-6 6-4 in the Knoxville CH quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Tennys Sandgren came in defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Sandgren T.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Ritschard A.

Ritschard A.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Sandgren T.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Sandgren T.Ritschard A.
1st serve in·Even
61%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
76%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Even
65%
62%
Return points won·Even
36%
40%
Break points saved·Even
60%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.9
3.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.3
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (71 vs 158). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Sandgren T.Ritschard A.
Clutch Rating·Even
36
36
Break points saved·Slight edge
92
84
Break points won·Clear edge
2
14
Deciding sets·Clear edge
28
41
Tiebreaks·Dominant
86
59

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Sandgren T.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Ritschard A.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.5
Surface form
7.1
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Minutes 14d
7.1
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
7.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Michelsen A.[3]
Kudla D.
7-54-66-2
Semi-finals
Michelsen A.[3]
Sandgren T.
6-22-66-4
Kudla D.
Nava E.[5]
5-76-46-1
Quarter-finals
Michelsen A.[3]
Basavareddy N.
6-36-3
Kudla D.
Mchugh A.
6-37-65
Nava E.[5]
Svajda Z.[4]
6-46-4
Sandgren T.
Ritschard A.
7-696-4
R16
Basavareddy N.
Zhukayev B.
6-46-2
Nava E.[5]
Cassone M.
6-46-4
Kudla D.
Damm M.
7-646-3
Ritschard A.
Krueger M.
6-26-4
Svajda Z.[4]
Fanselow S.
6-27-5
Sandgren T.
Holt B.
6-37-5
Michelsen A.[3]
Debru G.
6-33-66-4
Mchugh A.
Kwiatkowski T.
0-66-46-3
R32
Kudla D.
Kypson P.
6-756-36-4
Ritschard A.
Shang J.[8]
3-67-696-2
Cassone M.
Harrison C.
6-16-4
Svajda Z.[4]
Mayo A.
6-36-4
Debru G.
Monday J.
4-67-56-3
Basavareddy N.
Rosenkranz M.
4-66-27-5
Zhukayev B.
Droguet T.[6]
6-46-1
Krueger M.
Karlovskiy E.
7-56-2
Fanselow S.
Kingsley C.
6-46-2
Kwiatkowski T.
Kirchheimer S.
6-756-26-4
Holt B.
Kovacevic A.[2]
6-43-67-61
Michelsen A.[3]
Tomic B.
4-67-656-4
Mchugh A.
Cozbinov A.
3-67-56-3
Sandgren T.
Quinn E.
4-67-667-63
Nava E.[5]
Serdarusic N.
6-46-4
Damm M.
Mmoh M.[1]
6-46-3