Renzo Olivo vs Luis Jose Nakamine — Lima CH Qualifying Round 1

Lima CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
Renzo Olivo
ARG3
Renzo Olivo
34 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 November 2023
clay
PER
Luis Jose Nakamine
#1964ATP
20 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LL
Olivo R.
6-3 6-3
Nakamine L.
Olivo R.
662
Nakamine L.
330

Renzo Olivo defeated Luis Jose Nakamine 6-3 6-3 in the Lima CH qualifying round 1 on clay. The result followed the form book — Renzo Olivo came in defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Olivo R.serving67% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Nakamine L.

Nakamine L.serving53% hold

wins 51% of points on serve vs Olivo R.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. Small sample — read as indicative. About

Statistics

This season
Olivo R.Nakamine L.
1st serve in·Slight edge
62%
73%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
64%
44%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
46%
40%
Service points won·Clear edge
57%
43%
Return points won·Slight edge
40%
34%
Break points saved·Dominant
54%
15%
Aces / match·Clear edge
1.8
0.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.5
0.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (144 vs 2). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Olivo R.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Nakamine L.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.7
Surface form
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.9
Minutes 14d
8.0
Prev. match
Context
7.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Q2
Sakamoto P.[3]
Rodriguez S.
6-36-2
Buse I.
Roberts J.
6-47-5
Justo G.[6]
Hoyos Franco A.[10]
0-66-26-1
Lilov V.[2]
Tenti F.
6-27-5
Prado Angelo J.
Gomez J.
6-36-4
Franco Descotte M.[1]
Ballotta G.
6-36-1
Vacherot V.[5]
Luz O.[12]
6-26-766-3
Feldbausch K.
Mejia N.
6-27-64
Reis Da Silva J.[6]
Dutra Da Silva D.
6-25-76-1
Pucinelli De Almeida M.[11]
Olivo R.[3]
6-47-5
Alves M.
Boyer T.[4]
6-17-65
Guillen Meza A.[9]
Dellien Velasco M.[2]
5-76-26-3
Q1
Justo G.[6]
Schachter N.
6-776-36-3
Rodriguez S.
Ogura K.[11]
6-47-5
Roberts J.
Sheehy J.[5]
6-26-3
Tenti F.
Soto M.[7]
6-31-67-68
Buse I.
Buitrago N.
4-66-36-1
Ballotta G.
Rodriguez Rodriguez J.[9]
6-43-66-2
Prado Angelo J.
Carou I.[12]
6-36-1
Sakamoto P.[3]
Martin D.
6-26-2
Lilov V.[2]
Tacchi L.
6-46-1
Gomez J.
Cid R.[4]
3-66-44-1
Mejia N.
Campana Lee G.
6-36-2
Boyer T.[4]
Boscardin Dias P.
6-34-66-3
Reis Da Silva J.[6]
Alvarado Berrospi A.
6-06-1
Luz O.[12]
Villanueva G.
6-36-786-4
Olivo R.[3]
Nakamine L.
6-36-3
Alves M.
Ribeiro E.[8]
6-25-76-3
Guillen Meza A.[9]
Barrena A.
7-56-1
Dutra Da Silva D.
Elias G.[10]
6-26-0
Vacherot V.[5]
Houkes M.
6-46-726-4
Pucinelli De Almeida M.[11]
Panta Herreros J.
6-26-3
Feldbausch K.
Heide G.[1]
1-66-26-4