Sumit Nagal vs Jakub Mensik — Helsinki CH Round of 16

Helsinki CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Sumit Nagal
IND
Sumit Nagal
#241ATP
1543ELO
1476Hard ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWWWWWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 November 2023
hard
Jakub Mensik
CZE
Jakub Mensik
#19ATP
1931ELO
1893Hard ELO
$2.0MYTD
$6.9MCAREER
20 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWWWWL
Nagal S.
7-5 6-2
Mensik J.
Nagal S.
762
Mensik J.
520

Sumit Nagal defeated Jakub Mensik 7-5 6-2 in the Helsinki CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Jakub Mensik came in ranked #19.

Key context

  • Match story: Sumit Nagal closed it out in two sets, 7–5 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nagal S.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Mensik J.

Mensik J.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Nagal S.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Nagal S.Mensik J.
—
Serve
42
—
Return
51

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Nagal S.Mensik J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
70%
59%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
64%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
60%
65%
Return points won·Slight edge
42%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
58%
63%
Aces / match·Dominant
1.4
10.2
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.8
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 186). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nagal S.Mensik J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
33
88
Break points saved·Dominant
69
98
Break points won·Dominant
35
77
Deciding sets·Dominant
16
92
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
84
99

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Nagal S.
4.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Mensik J.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
0.0Hard Elo 1476
Surface ELO
10.0+417 Hard Elo edge
0.0Overall Elo 1543
ELO gap
10.0Overall Elo 1931
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.5
Surface form
4.5
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
8.8
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Nagal S.Mensik J.
Freshness·Slight edge
96
90

Nagal S.: 8 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Mensik J.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Moutet C.
Nagal S.
6-33-66-2
Semi-finals
Nagal S.
Travaglia S.
6-16-4
Moutet C.
Rinderknech A.[7]
5-77-56-3
Quarter-finals
Nagal S.
Ruusuvuori E.[2]
6-33-1
Travaglia S.
Albot R.
6-43-67-5
Rinderknech A.[7]
Muller A.[4]
6-776-36-1
Moutet C.
Munar J.[5]
6-27-62
R16
Ruusuvuori E.[2]
Molcan A.
6-27-5
Nagal S.
Mensik J.
7-56-2
Albot R.
Borges N.[3]
6-41-66-4
Rinderknech A.[7]
Dzumhur D.
7-56-2
Muller A.[4]
Lajal M.
6-10-66-1
Munar J.[5]
Neuchrist M.
6-27-63
Moutet C.
Bellier A.
6-46-4
Travaglia S.
Yevseyev D.
6-36-0
R32
Bellier A.
Machac T.[1]
4-64-1
Mensik J.
Cobolli F.[6]
7-57-66
Nagal S.
Novak D.
6-26-3
Ruusuvuori E.[2]
De Loore J.
4-66-06-1
Neuchrist M.
Krutykh O.
7-677-5
Yevseyev D.
Virtanen O.
7-56-3
Rinderknech A.[7]
Vavassori A.
6-47-63
Munar J.[5]
Kaukovalta P.
7-56-4
Borges N.[3]
Goffin D.
6-33-66-3
Travaglia S.
Broady L.[8]
6-46-2
Dzumhur D.
Riedi L.
3-66-46-3
Lajal M.
Maestrelli F.
6-16-3
Muller A.[4]
Vasa E.
6-46-3
Moutet C.
Cressy M.
6-46-2
Albot R.
Kachmazov A.
6-26-1
Molcan A.
Bellucci M.
6-02-66-1