Zachary Svajda vs Aidan Mayo — Knoxville CH Round of 32

Knoxville CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Zachary Svajda
USA4
Zachary Svajda
#72ATP
1718ELO
1690Hard ELO
$631kYTD
$1.9MCAREER
23 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 November 2023
hard
USA
Aidan Mayo
#674ATP
1380ELO
1359Hard ELO
23 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLWW
Svajda Z.
6-3 6-4
Mayo A.
Svajda Z.
662
Mayo A.
340

Zachary Svajda defeated Aidan Mayo 6-3 6-4 in the Knoxville CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Zachary Svajda came in ranked #72, defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Svajda Z.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Mayo A.

Mayo A.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Svajda Z.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Svajda Z.Mayo A.
30
Serve
—
12
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Svajda Z.Mayo A.
1st serve in·Slight edge
61%
56%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
51%
Service points won·Even
64%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Even
61%
60%
Aces / match·Even
5.0
5.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.1
4.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 146). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Svajda Z.Mayo A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
69
12
Break points saved·Clear edge
89
68
Break points won·Dominant
66
1
Deciding sets·Dominant
69
8
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
75
52

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Svajda Z.
8.2
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Mayo A.
4.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
9.3+331 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.7Hard Elo 1359
9.4Overall Elo 1718
ELO gap
0.6Overall Elo 1380
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
8.5
Surface form
7.4
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Minutes 14d
5.2
7.0
3-set count
4.0
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Svajda Z.Mayo A.
Freshness·Slight edge
86
93

Svajda Z.: 10 days rest · 3 matches (14d) · Mayo A.: 9 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Michelsen A.[3]
Kudla D.
7-54-66-2
Semi-finals
Michelsen A.[3]
Sandgren T.
6-22-66-4
Kudla D.
Nava E.[5]
5-76-46-1
Quarter-finals
Michelsen A.[3]
Basavareddy N.
6-36-3
Kudla D.
Mchugh A.
6-37-65
Nava E.[5]
Svajda Z.[4]
6-46-4
Sandgren T.
Ritschard A.
7-696-4
R16
Basavareddy N.
Zhukayev B.
6-46-2
Nava E.[5]
Cassone M.
6-46-4
Kudla D.
Damm M.
7-646-3
Ritschard A.
Krueger M.
6-26-4
Svajda Z.[4]
Fanselow S.
6-27-5
Sandgren T.
Holt B.
6-37-5
Michelsen A.[3]
Debru G.
6-33-66-4
Mchugh A.
Kwiatkowski T.
0-66-46-3
R32
Kudla D.
Kypson P.
6-756-36-4
Ritschard A.
Shang J.[8]
3-67-696-2
Cassone M.
Harrison C.
6-16-4
Svajda Z.[4]
Mayo A.
6-36-4
Debru G.
Monday J.
4-67-56-3
Basavareddy N.
Rosenkranz M.
4-66-27-5
Zhukayev B.
Droguet T.[6]
6-46-1
Krueger M.
Karlovskiy E.
7-56-2
Fanselow S.
Kingsley C.
6-46-2
Kwiatkowski T.
Kirchheimer S.
6-756-26-4
Holt B.
Kovacevic A.[2]
6-43-67-61
Michelsen A.[3]
Tomic B.
4-67-656-4
Mchugh A.
Cozbinov A.
3-67-56-3
Sandgren T.
Quinn E.
4-67-667-63
Nava E.[5]
Serdarusic N.
6-46-4
Damm M.
Mmoh M.[1]
6-46-3