Emil Ruusuvuori vs Joris De Loore — Helsinki CH Round of 32

Helsinki CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
FIN2
Emil Ruusuvuori
#787ATP
1606ELO
1577Hard ELO
27 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 6 November 2023
hard
BEL
Joris De Loore
#1076ATP
33 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLWWWL
Ruusuvuori E.
4-6 6-0 6-1
De Loore J.
Ruusuvuori E.
4662
De Loore J.
6011

Emil Ruusuvuori defeated Joris De Loore 4-6 6-0 6-1 in the Helsinki CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ruusuvuori E.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs De Loore J.

De Loore J.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Ruusuvuori E.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ruusuvuori E.De Loore J.
1st serve in·Even
64%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
71%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Even
64%
67%
Return points won·Even
36%
35%
Break points saved·Even
63%
63%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.5
8.5
Double faults / match·Even
2.5
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (116 vs 106). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ruusuvuori E.De Loore J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
72
23
Break points saved·Clear edge
97
84
Break points won·Dominant
48
6
Deciding sets·Dominant
80
11
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
86
63

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ruusuvuori E.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
De Loore J.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.6
Surface form
6.9
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.6
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Moutet C.
Nagal S.
6-33-66-2
Semi-finals
Nagal S.
Travaglia S.
6-16-4
Moutet C.
Rinderknech A.[7]
5-77-56-3
Quarter-finals
Nagal S.
Ruusuvuori E.[2]
6-33-1
Travaglia S.
Albot R.
6-43-67-5
Rinderknech A.[7]
Muller A.[4]
6-776-36-1
Moutet C.
Munar J.[5]
6-27-62
R16
Ruusuvuori E.[2]
Molcan A.
6-27-5
Nagal S.
Mensik J.
7-56-2
Albot R.
Borges N.[3]
6-41-66-4
Rinderknech A.[7]
Dzumhur D.
7-56-2
Muller A.[4]
Lajal M.
6-10-66-1
Munar J.[5]
Neuchrist M.
6-27-63
Moutet C.
Bellier A.
6-46-4
Travaglia S.
Yevseyev D.
6-36-0
R32
Bellier A.
Machac T.[1]
4-64-1
Mensik J.
Cobolli F.[6]
7-57-66
Nagal S.
Novak D.
6-26-3
Ruusuvuori E.[2]
De Loore J.
4-66-06-1
Neuchrist M.
Krutykh O.
7-677-5
Yevseyev D.
Virtanen O.
7-56-3
Rinderknech A.[7]
Vavassori A.
6-47-63
Munar J.[5]
Kaukovalta P.
7-56-4
Borges N.[3]
Goffin D.
6-33-66-3
Travaglia S.
Broady L.[8]
6-46-2
Dzumhur D.
Riedi L.
3-66-46-3
Lajal M.
Maestrelli F.
6-16-3
Muller A.[4]
Vasa E.
6-46-3
Moutet C.
Cressy M.
6-46-2
Albot R.
Kachmazov A.
6-26-1
Molcan A.
Bellucci M.
6-02-66-1