Aidan Mchugh vs Thai Son Kwiatkowski — Knoxville CH Round of 16

Knoxville CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
GBR
Aidan Mchugh
#489ATP
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 6 November 2023
hard
USA
Thai Son Kwiatkowski
#1589ATP
31 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLLLL
Mchugh A.
0-6 6-4 6-3
Kwiatkowski T.
Mchugh A.
0662
Kwiatkowski T.
6431

Aidan Mchugh defeated Thai Son Kwiatkowski 0-6 6-4 6-3 in the Knoxville CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Aidan Mchugh came in ranked #489, defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mchugh A.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Kwiatkowski T.

Kwiatkowski T.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Mchugh A.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Mchugh A.Kwiatkowski T.
1st serve in·Slight edge
66%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
66%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
61%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
62%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.3
6.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.5
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (53 vs 83). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mchugh A.Kwiatkowski T.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
23
5
Break points saved·Slight edge
72
65
Break points won·Even
5
6
Deciding sets·Dominant
49
1
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
11
26

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mchugh A.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Kwiatkowski T.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
2.9
Surface form
5.7
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Minutes 14d
8.4
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Michelsen A.[3]
Kudla D.
7-54-66-2
Semi-finals
Michelsen A.[3]
Sandgren T.
6-22-66-4
Kudla D.
Nava E.[5]
5-76-46-1
Quarter-finals
Michelsen A.[3]
Basavareddy N.
6-36-3
Kudla D.
Mchugh A.
6-37-65
Nava E.[5]
Svajda Z.[4]
6-46-4
Sandgren T.
Ritschard A.
7-696-4
R16
Basavareddy N.
Zhukayev B.
6-46-2
Nava E.[5]
Cassone M.
6-46-4
Kudla D.
Damm M.
7-646-3
Ritschard A.
Krueger M.
6-26-4
Svajda Z.[4]
Fanselow S.
6-27-5
Sandgren T.
Holt B.
6-37-5
Michelsen A.[3]
Debru G.
6-33-66-4
Mchugh A.
Kwiatkowski T.
0-66-46-3
R32
Kudla D.
Kypson P.
6-756-36-4
Ritschard A.
Shang J.[8]
3-67-696-2
Cassone M.
Harrison C.
6-16-4
Svajda Z.[4]
Mayo A.
6-36-4
Debru G.
Monday J.
4-67-56-3
Basavareddy N.
Rosenkranz M.
4-66-27-5
Zhukayev B.
Droguet T.[6]
6-46-1
Krueger M.
Karlovskiy E.
7-56-2
Fanselow S.
Kingsley C.
6-46-2
Kwiatkowski T.
Kirchheimer S.
6-756-26-4
Holt B.
Kovacevic A.[2]
6-43-67-61
Michelsen A.[3]
Tomic B.
4-67-656-4
Mchugh A.
Cozbinov A.
3-67-56-3
Sandgren T.
Quinn E.
4-67-667-63
Nava E.[5]
Serdarusic N.
6-46-4
Damm M.
Mmoh M.[1]
6-46-3