Denis Kudla vs Emilio Nava — Knoxville CH Semi-final

Knoxville CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
USA
Denis Kudla
33 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 6 November 2023
hard
Emilio Nava
USA5
Emilio Nava
#91ATP
1704ELO
1621Hard ELO
$533kYTD
$2.1MCAREER
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWWWW
Kudla D.
5-7 6-4 6-1
Nava E.
Kudla D.
5662
Nava E.
7411

Denis Kudla defeated Emilio Nava 5-7 6-4 6-1 in the Knoxville CH semi-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Denis Kudla came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Denis Kudla extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-03-04Indian Wells MastersQ2hardDenis Kudla6-2 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Kudla D.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Nava E.

Nava E.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Kudla D.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Kudla D.Nava E.
—
Serve
40
—
Return
16

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Kudla D.Nava E.
1st serve in·Even
59%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
64%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Even
61%
63%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.7
7.6
Double faults / match·Even
2.7
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (101 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kudla D.Nava E.
Clutch Rating·Even
50
52
Break points saved·Even
90
94
Break points won·Even
19
17
Deciding sets·Slight edge
81
89
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
30
23

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kudla D.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Nava E.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
4.6
H2H
5.4
5.2
Surface form
5.1
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.5
Minutes 14d
8.0
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Kudla D.Nava E.
Freshness·
—
100

Nava E.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Michelsen A.[3]
Kudla D.
7-54-66-2
Semi-finals
Michelsen A.[3]
Sandgren T.
6-22-66-4
Kudla D.
Nava E.[5]
5-76-46-1
Quarter-finals
Michelsen A.[3]
Basavareddy N.
6-36-3
Kudla D.
Mchugh A.
6-37-65
Nava E.[5]
Svajda Z.[4]
6-46-4
Sandgren T.
Ritschard A.
7-696-4
R16
Basavareddy N.
Zhukayev B.
6-46-2
Nava E.[5]
Cassone M.
6-46-4
Kudla D.
Damm M.
7-646-3
Ritschard A.
Krueger M.
6-26-4
Svajda Z.[4]
Fanselow S.
6-27-5
Sandgren T.
Holt B.
6-37-5
Michelsen A.[3]
Debru G.
6-33-66-4
Mchugh A.
Kwiatkowski T.
0-66-46-3
R32
Kudla D.
Kypson P.
6-756-36-4
Ritschard A.
Shang J.[8]
3-67-696-2
Cassone M.
Harrison C.
6-16-4
Svajda Z.[4]
Mayo A.
6-36-4
Debru G.
Monday J.
4-67-56-3
Basavareddy N.
Rosenkranz M.
4-66-27-5
Zhukayev B.
Droguet T.[6]
6-46-1
Krueger M.
Karlovskiy E.
7-56-2
Fanselow S.
Kingsley C.
6-46-2
Kwiatkowski T.
Kirchheimer S.
6-756-26-4
Holt B.
Kovacevic A.[2]
6-43-67-61
Michelsen A.[3]
Tomic B.
4-67-656-4
Mchugh A.
Cozbinov A.
3-67-56-3
Sandgren T.
Quinn E.
4-67-667-63
Nava E.[5]
Serdarusic N.
6-46-4
Damm M.
Mmoh M.[1]
6-46-3