Tatsuma Ito vs San Hui Sin — Matsuyama CH Qualifying Round 1

Matsuyama CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
JPN
Tatsuma Ito
38 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 November 2023
hard
KOR11
San Hui Sin
1265ELO
1242Hard ELO
29 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLWLL
Ito T.
7-6 6-3
Sin S.
Ito T.
7762
Sin S.
6430

Tatsuma Ito defeated San Hui Sin 7-6 6-3 in the Matsuyama CH qualifying round 1 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Tatsuma Ito closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ito T.serving67% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Sin S.

Sin S.serving66% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Ito T.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ito T.Sin S.
1st serve in·Even
61%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
62%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
45%
Service points won·Even
58%
56%
Return points won·Even
39%
41%
Break points saved·Slight edge
63%
52%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.9
2.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.0
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (17 vs 44). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ito T.
4.4
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 84 days (−1.2)
Sin S.
3.2
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 189 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.8
Surface form
1.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 5
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Q2
Holmgren A.[8]
Gerasimov E.[3]
6-47-63
Ellis B.[6]
Noguchi R.[7]
6-40-67-5
Moriya H.[9]
Bai Y.[5]
1-66-36-1
Trotter J.
Escobedo E.[4]
2-66-47-68
Li Z.
Ito T.
4-66-46-2
Nakagawa N.[1]
Takahashi Y.[10]
6-36-2
Q1
Gerasimov E.[3]
Fenty A.
6-06-1
Li Z.
Kumar O.[2]
6-37-64
Noguchi R.[7]
Nishiwaki K.
6-27-5
Ellis B.[6]
Cui J.
6-16-4
Moriya H.[9]
Nakamura G.
6-26-4
Bai Y.[5]
Matsuda R.
6-26-4
Trotter J.
Mochizuki Y.
6-786-36-1
Escobedo E.[4]
Ochi M.
6-36-2
Ito T.
Sin S.[11]
7-646-3
Takahashi Y.[10]
Kusuhara Y.
6-26-2