Cem Ilkel vs Max Purcell — Sofia Round of 16

Sofia · ATP · Round of 16
Cem Ilkel
TUR
Cem Ilkel
#1462ATP
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 6 November 2023
hard
AUS6
Max Purcell
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLWW
Ilkel C.
6-3 4-6 6-4
Purcell M.
Ilkel C.
6462
Purcell M.
3641

Cem Ilkel defeated Max Purcell 6-3 4-6 6-4 in the Sofia round of 16 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Cem Ilkel closed it out in three sets, 6–3 4–6 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ilkel C.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Purcell M.

Purcell M.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Ilkel C.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ilkel C.Purcell M.
1st serve in·Even
58%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
51%
Service points won·Even
62%
64%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
55%
64%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.6
7.5
Double faults / match·Even
2.4
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (90 vs 124). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ilkel C.Purcell M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
32
59
Break points saved·Dominant
49
92
Break points won·Slight edge
3
10
Deciding sets·Clear edge
70
84
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
66
81

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ilkel C.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Purcell M.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.4
Surface form
1.6
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
7.6
Minutes 14d
7.9
7.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Mannarino A.[2]
Draper J.
7-662-66-3
Semi-finals
Draper J.
Struff J.[3]
6-36-4
Mannarino A.[2]
Kotov P.
6-27-62
Quarter-finals
Kotov P.
Fucsovics M.[8]
6-37-63
Struff J.[3]
Marozsan F.
7-634-66-4
Mannarino A.[2]
Ofner S.[7]
6-776-46-3
Draper J.
Ilkel C.
6-26-2
R16
Kotov P.
Baez S.[4]
3-67-640-0
Struff J.[3]
Harris B.
7-656-4
Fucsovics M.[8]
Rodionov J.
3-66-46-1
Ofner S.[7]
Oconnell C.
6-766-46-2
Marozsan F.
Bautista Agut R.
6-33-67-64
Ilkel C.
Purcell M.[6]
6-34-66-4
Mannarino A.[2]
Ramos A.
6-46-4
Draper J.
Musetti L.[1]
7-56-2
R32
Bautista Agut R.
Kecmanovic M.[9]
7-696-727-65
Ofner S.[7]
Sachko V.
6-43-66-2
Draper J.
Marterer M.
6-36-2
Fucsovics M.[8]
Atmane T.
7-646-3
Marozsan F.
Piros Z.
6-36-1
Harris B.
Huesler M.
6-43-67-65
Ilkel C.
Kuzmanov D.
6-06-3
Purcell M.[6]
Hijikata R.
6-36-3
Rodionov J.
Moreno De Alboran N.
7-646-746-4
Oconnell C.
Medjedovic H.
6-736-17-62
Ramos A.
Carballes Baena R.
7-54-66-3
Kotov P.
Lazarov A.
3-66-16-2