Tennys Sandgren vs Brandon Holt — Knoxville CH Round of 16

Knoxville CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
USA
Tennys Sandgren
34 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 November 2023
hard
USA
Brandon Holt
#657ATP
1537ELO
1507Hard ELO
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLWW
Sandgren T.
6-3 7-5
Holt B.
Sandgren T.
672
Holt B.
350

Tennys Sandgren defeated Brandon Holt 6-3 7-5 in the Knoxville CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Tennys Sandgren came in defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Sandgren T.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Holt B.

Holt B.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Sandgren T.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Sandgren T.Holt B.
1st serve in·Slight edge
61%
66%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
76%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Even
65%
63%
Return points won·Even
36%
39%
Break points saved·Even
60%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.9
4.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.3
1.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (71 vs 189). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Sandgren T.Holt B.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
36
58
Break points saved·Slight edge
92
85
Break points won·Dominant
2
31
Deciding sets·Dominant
28
79
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
86
69

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Sandgren T.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Holt B.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
6.7No prior meetings
H2H
3.3
4.5
Surface form
5.2
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Minutes 14d
7.8
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
7.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Michelsen A.[3]
Kudla D.
7-54-66-2
Semi-finals
Michelsen A.[3]
Sandgren T.
6-22-66-4
Kudla D.
Nava E.[5]
5-76-46-1
Quarter-finals
Michelsen A.[3]
Basavareddy N.
6-36-3
Kudla D.
Mchugh A.
6-37-65
Nava E.[5]
Svajda Z.[4]
6-46-4
Sandgren T.
Ritschard A.
7-696-4
R16
Basavareddy N.
Zhukayev B.
6-46-2
Nava E.[5]
Cassone M.
6-46-4
Kudla D.
Damm M.
7-646-3
Ritschard A.
Krueger M.
6-26-4
Svajda Z.[4]
Fanselow S.
6-27-5
Sandgren T.
Holt B.
6-37-5
Michelsen A.[3]
Debru G.
6-33-66-4
Mchugh A.
Kwiatkowski T.
0-66-46-3
R32
Kudla D.
Kypson P.
6-756-36-4
Ritschard A.
Shang J.[8]
3-67-696-2
Cassone M.
Harrison C.
6-16-4
Svajda Z.[4]
Mayo A.
6-36-4
Debru G.
Monday J.
4-67-56-3
Basavareddy N.
Rosenkranz M.
4-66-27-5
Zhukayev B.
Droguet T.[6]
6-46-1
Krueger M.
Karlovskiy E.
7-56-2
Fanselow S.
Kingsley C.
6-46-2
Kwiatkowski T.
Kirchheimer S.
6-756-26-4
Holt B.
Kovacevic A.[2]
6-43-67-61
Michelsen A.[3]
Tomic B.
4-67-656-4
Mchugh A.
Cozbinov A.
3-67-56-3
Sandgren T.
Quinn E.
4-67-667-63
Nava E.[5]
Serdarusic N.
6-46-4
Damm M.
Mmoh M.[1]
6-46-3