Luciano Darderi vs Kilian Feldbausch — Lima CH Round of 32

Lima CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Luciano Darderi
ITA
Luciano Darderi
#16ATP
1835ELO
1836Clay ELO
$1.3MYTD
$4.7MCAREER
24 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLWWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 6 November 2023
clay
SUI
Kilian Feldbausch
#288ATP
1618ELO
1599Clay ELO
20 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWWWW
Darderi L.
6-4 3-6 7-5
Feldbausch K.
Darderi L.
6372
Feldbausch K.
4651

Luciano Darderi defeated Kilian Feldbausch 6-4 3-6 7-5 in the Lima CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Luciano Darderi came in ranked #16.

Key context

  • Match story: Luciano Darderi closed it out in three sets, 6–4 3–6 7–5.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Darderi L.serving61% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Feldbausch K.

Feldbausch K.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Darderi L.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Darderi L.Feldbausch K.
52
Serve
—
73
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Darderi L.Feldbausch K.
1st serve in·Clear edge
58%
71%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
62%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
48%
Service points won·Slight edge
64%
58%
Return points won·Slight edge
39%
46%
Break points saved·Slight edge
61%
55%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.4
1.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.4
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 94). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Darderi L.Feldbausch K.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
78
44
Break points saved·Dominant
94
27
Break points won·Clear edge
50
64
Deciding sets·Clear edge
93
77
Tiebreaks·
94
—

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Darderi L.
7.4
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Feldbausch K.
2.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
8.8+236 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.2Clay Elo 1599
8.4Overall Elo 1835
ELO gap
1.6Overall Elo 1618
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.2
Surface form
2.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
4.7
Minutes 14d
8.5
4.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Darderi L.Feldbausch K.
Freshness·Slight edge
98
87

Darderi L.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Feldbausch K.: 8 days rest · 5 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Guillen Meza A.
Bicknell B.
7-636-1
Darderi L.
Navone M.
4-66-37-5
Semi-finals
Bicknell B.
Dellien Velasco M.[4]
3-67-666-3
Guillen Meza A.
Olivo R.[2]
7-57-5
Darderi L.
Tabilo A.
7-54-66-3
Navone M.
Comesana F.[8]
3-66-36-2
Quarter-finals
Guillen Meza A.
Huertas Del Pino A.
6-25-76-4
Bicknell B.
Buse I.
3-67-626-4
Olivo R.[2]
Bueno G.[8]
4-66-36-3
Dellien Velasco M.[4]
Lama G.[6]
6-27-66
Navone M.
Andreozzi G.
6-22-2
Tabilo A.
Burruchaga R.
6-27-5
Darderi L.
Varillas J.[1]
6-766-36-0
Comesana F.[8]
Galan D.[3]
6-46-4
R16
Huertas Del Pino A.
Reis Da Silva J.[3]
7-52-66-2
Dellien Velasco M.[4]
Sakamoto P.
5-76-06-0
Bueno G.[8]
Andrade A.
6-36-2
Buse I.
Vallejo A.
7-57-64
Bicknell B.
Ficovich J.[1]
7-54-66-3
Olivo R.[2]
Villanueva G.
0-66-36-4
Guillen Meza A.
Heide G.[5]
6-22-67-64
Lama G.[6]
Otegui J.
7-686-4
Andreozzi G.
Huertas Del Pino A.
6-25-76-4
Comesana F.[8]
Ymer E.
6-44-66-4
Tabilo A.
Huertas Del Pino C.
6-36-4
Burruchaga R.
Lavagno E.
6-36-0
Varillas J.[1]
Reis Da Silva J.
6-26-0
Darderi L.
Ugo Carabelli C.
6-46-2
Navone M.
Guillen Meza A.
6-36-2
Galan D.[3]
Giannessi A.
6-46-3
R32
Heide G.[5]
Monzon I.
6-06-736-1
Andrade A.
Aboian L.
6-36-4
Otegui J.
Franco Descotte M.
6-36-4
Olivo R.[2]
Huertas Del Pino C.
3-67-57-5
Villanueva G.
Prado Angelo J.
6-31-67-5
Sakamoto P.
Justo G.
6-47-65
Dellien Velasco M.[4]
Alves M.
6-12-66-0
Ficovich J.[1]
Farjat T.
6-17-61
Huertas Del Pino A.
Kuzuhara B.
6-41-66-3
Vallejo A.
Boscardin Dias P.
6-26-4
Reis Da Silva J.[3]
Leite W.
6-16-3
Buse I.
Dutra Da Silva D.[7]
3-66-36-2
Bicknell B.
Lilov V.
6-26-4
Guillen Meza A.
Aboian V.
6-16-2
Bueno G.[8]
Cossu M.
6-26-3
Lama G.[6]
Panta Herreros J.
6-746-47-5
Reis Da Silva J.
Vacherot V.
6-36-0
Varillas J.[1]
Meligeni Alves F.
7-646-786-4
Navone M.
Coria F.[2]
6-47-64
Guillen Meza A.
Buse I.
6-726-36-4
Andreozzi G.
Cerundolo J.[7]
6-36-3
Galan D.[3]
Alves M.
3-66-17-65
Huertas Del Pino C.
Diaz Acosta F.[5]
6-26-2
Darderi L.
Feldbausch K.
6-43-67-5
Ymer E.
Agamenone F.
3-66-16-4
Comesana F.[8]
Pacheco Mendez R.
6-46-2
Lavagno E.
Barrios Vera T.[4]
6-42-66-3
Ugo Carabelli C.
Dellien H.[6]
6-46-1
Giannessi A.
Roca Batalla O.
1-66-36-2
Tabilo A.
Vallejo A.
6-46-1
Burruchaga R.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-16-2
Huertas Del Pino A.
Crawford O.
7-56-0