Taro Daniel vs August Holmgren — Matsuyama CH Semi-final

Matsuyama CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Taro Daniel
JPN1
Taro Daniel
#194ATP
1567ELO
1512Hard ELO
33 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 November 2023
hard
DEN
August Holmgren
#192ATP
1566ELO
1517Hard ELO
$130kYTD
$646kCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLWLWL
Daniel T.
7-6 6-2
Holmgren A.
Daniel T.
7762
Holmgren A.
6520

Taro Daniel defeated August Holmgren 7-6 6-2 in the Matsuyama CH semi-final on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Taro Daniel closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Daniel T.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Holmgren A.

Holmgren A.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Daniel T.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Daniel T.Holmgren A.
1st serve in·Even
60%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
69%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
53%
Service points won·Even
62%
66%
Return points won·Even
37%
35%
Break points saved·Even
62%
64%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.1
7.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.1
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 159). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Daniel T.Holmgren A.
Clutch Rating·Even
42
43
Break points saved·Even
93
90
Break points won·Dominant
37
0
Deciding sets·Dominant
16
46
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
81
96

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Daniel T.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Holmgren A.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
4.7Hard Elo 1512
Surface ELO
5.3+5 Hard Elo edge
4.5Overall Elo 1567
ELO gap
5.5Overall Elo 1566
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
8.6
Surface form
6.0
9.07-match win streak
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
1.6
Minutes 14d
4.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Daniel T.Holmgren A.
Freshness·Dominant
59
89

Daniel T.: 1 day rest · 4 matches, 83 games (7d) · Holmgren A.: 6 days rest · 1 match, 31 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Nardi L.[3]
Daniel T.[1]
3-66-46-2
Semi-finals
Nardi L.[3]
Blancaneaux G.
6-36-3
Daniel T.[1]
Holmgren A.
7-656-2
Quarter-finals
Blancaneaux G.
Hassan B.[5]
6-36-2
Daniel T.[1]
Hsu Y.[8]
6-23-67-5
Holmgren A.
Ajdukovic D.
7-53-67-65
Nardi L.[3]
Yunchaokete B.[7]
7-56-3
R16
Hsu Y.[8]
Shimizu Y.
6-46-3
Holmgren A.
Uchiyama Y.
7-687-65
Daniel T.[1]
Echargui M.
6-23-66-2
Hassan B.[5]
Ellis B.
1-67-646-3
Blancaneaux G.
Mochizuki S.[2]
7-56-3
Nardi L.[3]
Mccabe J.
6-46-4
Yunchaokete B.[7]
Sweeny D.
6-45-77-5
Ajdukovic D.
Shimabukuro S.[4]
7-636-3
R32
Shimizu Y.
Jung J.
6-42-66-4
Holmgren A.
Polmans M.[6]
6-06-4
Daniel T.[1]
Nakagawa S.
6-16-2
Mochizuki S.[2]
Nakagawa N.
6-26-2
Blancaneaux G.
Katayama S.
6-06-4
Ellis B.
Trotter J.
6-46-3
Hassan B.[5]
Moriya H.
6-46-4
Nardi L.[3]
Hong S.
7-53-67-64
Mccabe J.
Ferreira Silva F.
6-36-2
Sweeny D.
Li Z.
2-66-46-4
Uchiyama Y.
Wu T.
6-46-1
Ajdukovic D.
Uchida K.
6-46-4
Shimabukuro S.[4]
Fonio G.
5-76-46-4
Hsu Y.[8]
Kolar Z.
6-26-3
Echargui M.
Weber A.
6-06-3
Yunchaokete B.[7]
Efstathiou M.
6-746-26-2