Mariano Navone vs Federico Coria — Lima CH Round of 32

Lima CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Mariano Navone
ARG
Mariano Navone
#48ATP
1822ELO
1800Clay ELO
$722kYTD
$3.1MCAREER
25 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 November 2023
clay
Federico Coria
ARG2
Federico Coria
#783ATP
1537ELO
1515Clay ELO
34 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWWL
Navone M.
6-4 7-6
Coria F.
Navone M.
6772
Coria F.
4640

Mariano Navone defeated Federico Coria 6-4 7-6 in the Lima CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Mariano Navone came in ranked #48, leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending last year's round of 32. Mariano Navone extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-02-19Rio de JaneiroR32clayMariano Navone1-6 6-4 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Navone M.serving56% hold

wins 52% of points on serve vs Coria F.

Coria F.serving54% hold

wins 51% of points on serve vs Navone M.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Navone M.Coria F.
0
Serve
—
100
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Navone M.Coria F.
1st serve in·Even
67%
67%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
63%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
48%
Service points won·Even
59%
58%
Return points won·Even
43%
43%
Break points saved·Even
56%
55%
Aces / match·Slight edge
1.7
2.4
Double faults / match·Even
2.5
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 188). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Navone M.Coria F.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
75
67
Break points saved·Clear edge
86
71
Break points won·Clear edge
90
72
Deciding sets·Even
77
78
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
60
76

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Navone M.
8.3
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Coria F.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.7+285 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.3Clay Elo 1515
7.6Overall Elo 1822
ELO gap
2.4Overall Elo 1537
7.2
H2H
2.8
10.0
Surface form
7.7
10.010-match win streak
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
6.0
3-set count
0.0
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
8.5
5.0
Opponent rise

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Navone M.Coria F.
Freshness·Clear edge
96
80

Navone M.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Coria F.: 2 days rest · 3 matches, 53 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Guillen Meza A.
Bicknell B.
7-636-1
Darderi L.
Navone M.
4-66-37-5
Semi-finals
Bicknell B.
Dellien Velasco M.[4]
3-67-666-3
Guillen Meza A.
Olivo R.[2]
7-57-5
Darderi L.
Tabilo A.
7-54-66-3
Navone M.
Comesana F.[8]
3-66-36-2
Quarter-finals
Guillen Meza A.
Huertas Del Pino A.
6-25-76-4
Bicknell B.
Buse I.
3-67-626-4
Olivo R.[2]
Bueno G.[8]
4-66-36-3
Dellien Velasco M.[4]
Lama G.[6]
6-27-66
Navone M.
Andreozzi G.
6-22-2
Tabilo A.
Burruchaga R.
6-27-5
Darderi L.
Varillas J.[1]
6-766-36-0
Comesana F.[8]
Galan D.[3]
6-46-4
R16
Huertas Del Pino A.
Reis Da Silva J.[3]
7-52-66-2
Dellien Velasco M.[4]
Sakamoto P.
5-76-06-0
Bueno G.[8]
Andrade A.
6-36-2
Buse I.
Vallejo A.
7-57-64
Bicknell B.
Ficovich J.[1]
7-54-66-3
Olivo R.[2]
Villanueva G.
0-66-36-4
Guillen Meza A.
Heide G.[5]
6-22-67-64
Lama G.[6]
Otegui J.
7-686-4
Andreozzi G.
Huertas Del Pino A.
6-25-76-4
Comesana F.[8]
Ymer E.
6-44-66-4
Tabilo A.
Huertas Del Pino C.
6-36-4
Burruchaga R.
Lavagno E.
6-36-0
Varillas J.[1]
Reis Da Silva J.
6-26-0
Darderi L.
Ugo Carabelli C.
6-46-2
Navone M.
Guillen Meza A.
6-36-2
Galan D.[3]
Giannessi A.
6-46-3
R32
Heide G.[5]
Monzon I.
6-06-736-1
Andrade A.
Aboian L.
6-36-4
Otegui J.
Franco Descotte M.
6-36-4
Olivo R.[2]
Huertas Del Pino C.
3-67-57-5
Villanueva G.
Prado Angelo J.
6-31-67-5
Sakamoto P.
Justo G.
6-47-65
Dellien Velasco M.[4]
Alves M.
6-12-66-0
Ficovich J.[1]
Farjat T.
6-17-61
Huertas Del Pino A.
Kuzuhara B.
6-41-66-3
Vallejo A.
Boscardin Dias P.
6-26-4
Reis Da Silva J.[3]
Leite W.
6-16-3
Buse I.
Dutra Da Silva D.[7]
3-66-36-2
Bicknell B.
Lilov V.
6-26-4
Guillen Meza A.
Aboian V.
6-16-2
Bueno G.[8]
Cossu M.
6-26-3
Lama G.[6]
Panta Herreros J.
6-746-47-5
Reis Da Silva J.
Vacherot V.
6-36-0
Varillas J.[1]
Meligeni Alves F.
7-646-786-4
Navone M.
Coria F.[2]
6-47-64
Guillen Meza A.
Buse I.
6-726-36-4
Andreozzi G.
Cerundolo J.[7]
6-36-3
Galan D.[3]
Alves M.
3-66-17-65
Huertas Del Pino C.
Diaz Acosta F.[5]
6-26-2
Darderi L.
Feldbausch K.
6-43-67-5
Ymer E.
Agamenone F.
3-66-16-4
Comesana F.[8]
Pacheco Mendez R.
6-46-2
Lavagno E.
Barrios Vera T.[4]
6-42-66-3
Ugo Carabelli C.
Dellien H.[6]
6-46-1
Giannessi A.
Roca Batalla O.
1-66-36-2
Tabilo A.
Vallejo A.
6-46-1
Burruchaga R.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-16-2
Huertas Del Pino A.
Crawford O.
7-56-0