Camilo Ugo Carabelli vs Hugo Dellien — Lima CH Round of 32

Lima CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ARG
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
#59ATP
1744ELO
1732Clay ELO
$502kYTD
$2.6MCAREER
26 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10
LWLWWLWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 November 2023
clay
BOL
Hugo Dellien
[6]
#144ATP
1643ELO
1632Clay ELO
$114kYTD
$3.0MCAREER
32 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10
LWWWLWWWWW

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ugo Carabelli C.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Dellien H.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.6+99 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.4Clay Elo 1632
6.6Overall Elo 1744
ELO gap
3.4Overall Elo 1643
2.8
H2H
7.2
6.8
Surface form
7.9
Fatigue & Travel
3.9
Minutes 14d
4.5
4.0
3-set count
0.0
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Ugo Carabelli C.
662
Dellien H.
410

Head to head

4–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-02-02Rosario CHQFclayCamilo Ugo Carabelli6-4 6-2
2025-02-03Rosario CHFclayCamilo Ugo Carabelli3-6 6-3 6-2
2024-02-12Buenos AiresQ2clayCamilo Ugo Carabelli4-6 7-6(3) 6-3
2021-10-04Santiago 1 CHR16clayHugo Dellien6-2 4-6 6-2
2021-09-27Lima 1 CHFclayHugo Dellien6-3 7-5
2021-08-02Cordenons CHR32clayCamilo Ugo Carabelli7-6(4) 6-0

Statistics

Recent form
Ugo Carabelli C.Dellien H.
60%1st serve in+11%71%
70%1st serve points won+4%66%
49%2nd serve points won49%
62%Service points won+1%61%
36%Return points won+7%43%
64%Break points saved+4%60%
3.1Aces / match+0.32.8
2.3Double faults / match+0.81.5

Averages from each player's recent completed matches (20 vs 20). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Draw

Final
Guillen Meza A.
Bicknell B.
7-636-1
Darderi L.
Navone M.
4-66-37-5
Semi-finals
Bicknell B.
Dellien Velasco M.[4]
3-67-666-3
Guillen Meza A.
Olivo R.[2]
7-57-5
Darderi L.
Tabilo A.
7-54-66-3
Navone M.
Comesana F.[8]
3-66-36-2
Quarter-finals
Bicknell B.
Buse I.
3-67-626-4
Guillen Meza A.
Huertas Del Pino A.
6-25-76-4
Olivo R.[2]
Bueno G.[8]
4-66-36-3
Dellien Velasco M.[4]
Lama G.[6]
6-27-66
Tabilo A.
Burruchaga R.
6-27-5
Navone M.
Andreozzi G.
6-22-2
Darderi L.
Varillas J.[1]
6-766-36-0
Comesana F.[8]
Galan D.[3]
6-46-4
R16
Bueno G.[8]
Andrade A.
6-36-2
Buse I.
Vallejo A.
7-57-64
Bicknell B.
Ficovich J.[1]
7-54-66-3
Guillen Meza A.
Heide G.[5]
6-22-67-64
Lama G.[6]
Otegui J.
7-686-4
Olivo R.[2]
Villanueva G.
0-66-36-4
Huertas Del Pino A.
Reis Da Silva J.[3]
7-52-66-2
Dellien Velasco M.[4]
Sakamoto P.
5-76-06-0
Andreozzi G.
Huertas Del Pino A.
6-25-76-4
Tabilo A.
Huertas Del Pino C.
6-36-4
Burruchaga R.
Lavagno E.
6-36-0
Varillas J.[1]
Reis Da Silva J.
6-26-0
Darderi L.
Ugo Carabelli C.
6-46-2
Comesana F.[8]
Ymer E.
6-44-66-4
Navone M.
Guillen Meza A.
6-36-2
Galan D.[3]
Giannessi A.
6-46-3
R32
Villanueva G.
Prado Angelo J.
6-31-67-5
Olivo R.[2]
Huertas Del Pino C.
3-67-57-5
Huertas Del Pino A.
Kuzuhara B.
6-41-66-3
Vallejo A.
Boscardin Dias P.
6-26-4
Reis Da Silva J.[3]
Leite W.
6-16-3
Buse I.
Dutra Da Silva D.[7]
3-66-36-2
Heide G.[5]
Monzon I.
6-06-736-1
Dellien Velasco M.[4]
Alves M.
6-12-66-0
Bicknell B.
Lilov V.
6-26-4
Guillen Meza A.
Aboian V.
6-16-2
Bueno G.[8]
Cossu M.
6-26-3
Ficovich J.[1]
Farjat T.
6-17-61
Sakamoto P.
Justo G.
6-47-65
Andrade A.
Aboian L.
6-36-4
Otegui J.
Franco Descotte M.
6-36-4
Lama G.[6]
Panta Herreros J.
6-746-47-5
Reis Da Silva J.
Vacherot V.
6-36-0
Guillen Meza A.
Buse I.
6-726-36-4
Andreozzi G.
Cerundolo J.[7]
6-36-3
Varillas J.[1]
Meligeni Alves F.
7-646-786-4
Darderi L.
Feldbausch K.
6-43-67-5
Galan D.[3]
Alves M.
3-66-17-65
Ymer E.
Agamenone F.
3-66-16-4
Comesana F.[8]
Pacheco Mendez R.
6-46-2
Lavagno E.
Barrios Vera T.[4]
6-42-66-3
Ugo Carabelli C.
Dellien H.[6]
6-46-1
Huertas Del Pino C.
Diaz Acosta F.[5]
6-26-2
Giannessi A.
Roca Batalla O.
1-66-36-2
Tabilo A.
Vallejo A.
6-46-1
Burruchaga R.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-16-2
Huertas Del Pino A.
Crawford O.
7-56-0
Navone M.
Coria F.[2]
6-47-64