Luciano Darderi vs Camilo Ugo Carabelli — Lima CH Round of 16
Lima CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
#17ATP
1839ELO
1846Clay ELO
$1.2MYTD
$4.5MCAREER
24 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10
LWLWWLWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 November 2023
clay
#59ATP
1744ELO
1732Clay ELO
$502kYTD
$2.6MCAREER
26 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10
LWLWWLWLWL
Umpiry Score
Pre-match6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry ScoreForm & Matchup
5.5+115 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO4.5Clay Elo 1732
5.3Overall Elo 1839
ELO gap4.7Overall Elo 1744
3.3
H2H6.7
6.2
Surface form6.8
Fatigue & Travel
4.7
Minutes 14d3.9
4.0
3-set count4.0
9.0
Prev. match9.0
Context
5.0
Defending ptsThe Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.
Darderi L.
662
Ugo Carabelli C.
420
Head to head
4–2| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-07-20 | Umag | SF | clay | Luciano Darderi | 7-6(6) 6-3 |
| 2024-05-13 | Turin CH | R32 | clay | Luciano Darderi | 6-4 6-3 |
| 2024-04-29 | Cagliari CH | R16 | clay | Luciano Darderi | 6-3 6-0 |
| 2023-10-30 | Guayaquil CH | R16 | clay | Camilo Ugo Carabelli | 4-6 7-6(5) 6-2 |
| 2022-10-10 | Rio De Janeiro CH | R32 | clay | Luciano Darderi | 4-6 6-1 6-1 |
| 2021-11-08 | Montevideo CH | R32 | clay | Camilo Ugo Carabelli | 3-6 6-3 6-4 |
Statistics
Recent form57%1st serve in+3%60%
73%1st serve points won+3%70%
50%2nd serve points won+1%49%
63%Service points won+1%62%
39%Return points won+3%36%
57%Break points saved+7%64%
5.5Aces / match+2.43.1
2.5Double faults / match+0.22.3
Averages from each player's recent completed matches (20 vs 20). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Draw
Semi-finals
Bicknell B.
Dellien Velasco M.[4]
3-67-666-3
Guillen Meza A.
Olivo R.[2]
7-57-5
Darderi L.
Tabilo A.
7-54-66-3
Navone M.
Comesana F.[8]
3-66-36-2
Quarter-finals
Bicknell B.
Buse I.
3-67-626-4
Guillen Meza A.
Huertas Del Pino A.
6-25-76-4
Olivo R.[2]
Bueno G.[8]
4-66-36-3
Dellien Velasco M.[4]
Lama G.[6]
6-27-66
Tabilo A.
Burruchaga R.
6-27-5
Navone M.
Andreozzi G.
6-22-2
Darderi L.
Varillas J.[1]
6-766-36-0
Comesana F.[8]
Galan D.[3]
6-46-4
R16
Bueno G.[8]
Andrade A.
6-36-2
Buse I.
Vallejo A.
7-57-64
Bicknell B.
Ficovich J.[1]
7-54-66-3
Guillen Meza A.
Heide G.[5]
6-22-67-64
Lama G.[6]
Otegui J.
7-686-4
Olivo R.[2]
Villanueva G.
0-66-36-4
Huertas Del Pino A.
Reis Da Silva J.[3]
7-52-66-2
Dellien Velasco M.[4]
Sakamoto P.
5-76-06-0
Andreozzi G.
Huertas Del Pino A.
6-25-76-4
Tabilo A.
Huertas Del Pino C.
6-36-4
Burruchaga R.
Lavagno E.
6-36-0
Varillas J.[1]
Reis Da Silva J.
6-26-0
Darderi L.
Ugo Carabelli C.
6-46-2
Comesana F.[8]
Ymer E.
6-44-66-4
Navone M.
Guillen Meza A.
6-36-2
Galan D.[3]
Giannessi A.
6-46-3
R32
Villanueva G.
Prado Angelo J.
6-31-67-5
Olivo R.[2]
Huertas Del Pino C.
3-67-57-5
Huertas Del Pino A.
Kuzuhara B.
6-41-66-3
Vallejo A.
Boscardin Dias P.
6-26-4
Reis Da Silva J.[3]
Leite W.
6-16-3
Buse I.
Dutra Da Silva D.[7]
3-66-36-2
Heide G.[5]
Monzon I.
6-06-736-1
Dellien Velasco M.[4]
Alves M.
6-12-66-0
Bicknell B.
Lilov V.
6-26-4
Guillen Meza A.
Aboian V.
6-16-2
Bueno G.[8]
Cossu M.
6-26-3
Ficovich J.[1]
Farjat T.
6-17-61
Sakamoto P.
Justo G.
6-47-65
Andrade A.
Aboian L.
6-36-4
Otegui J.
Franco Descotte M.
6-36-4
Lama G.[6]
Panta Herreros J.
6-746-47-5
Reis Da Silva J.
Vacherot V.
6-36-0
Guillen Meza A.
Buse I.
6-726-36-4
Andreozzi G.
Cerundolo J.[7]
6-36-3
Varillas J.[1]
Meligeni Alves F.
7-646-786-4
Darderi L.
Feldbausch K.
6-43-67-5
Galan D.[3]
Alves M.
3-66-17-65
Ymer E.
Agamenone F.
3-66-16-4
Comesana F.[8]
Pacheco Mendez R.
6-46-2
Lavagno E.
Barrios Vera T.[4]
6-42-66-3
Ugo Carabelli C.
Dellien H.[6]
6-46-1
Huertas Del Pino C.
Diaz Acosta F.[5]
6-26-2
Giannessi A.
Roca Batalla O.
1-66-36-2
Tabilo A.
Vallejo A.
6-46-1
Burruchaga R.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-16-2
Huertas Del Pino A.
Crawford O.
7-56-0
Navone M.
Coria F.[2]
6-47-64