Alvaro Guillen Meza vs Ignacio Buse — Lima CH Round of 32

Lima CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ECU
Alvaro Guillen Meza
#277ATP
1442ELO
1412Clay ELO
23 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 6 November 2023
clay
Ignacio Buse
PER
Ignacio Buse
#33ATP
1822ELO
1786Clay ELO
$949kYTD
$1.4MCAREER
22 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWLWWW
Guillen Meza A.
6-7 6-3 6-4
Buse I.
Guillen Meza A.
62662
Buse I.
77341

Alvaro Guillen Meza defeated Ignacio Buse 6-7 6-3 6-4 in the Lima CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Ignacio Buse came in ranked #33, defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Guillen Meza A.serving59% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Buse I.

Buse I.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Guillen Meza A.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Guillen Meza A.Buse I.
—
Serve
41
—
Return
8

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Guillen Meza A.Buse I.
1st serve in·Slight edge
68%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
63%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
50%
Service points won·Even
58%
62%
Return points won·Even
43%
41%
Break points saved·Even
57%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
1.5
3.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.4
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (157 vs 164). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Guillen Meza A.Buse I.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
19
63
Break points saved·Dominant
43
87
Break points won·Clear edge
41
28
Deciding sets·Dominant
36
80
Tiebreaks·Dominant
17
93

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Guillen Meza A.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Buse I.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
2.5Clay Elo 1412
Surface ELO
7.5+375 Clay Elo edge
2.3Overall Elo 1442
ELO gap
7.7Overall Elo 1822
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.8
Surface form
6.4
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.6
Minutes 14d
6.5
7.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Guillen Meza A.Buse I.
Freshness·Even
95
98

Guillen Meza A.: 8 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Buse I.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Guillen Meza A.
Bicknell B.
7-636-1
Darderi L.
Navone M.
4-66-37-5
Semi-finals
Bicknell B.
Dellien Velasco M.[4]
3-67-666-3
Guillen Meza A.
Olivo R.[2]
7-57-5
Darderi L.
Tabilo A.
7-54-66-3
Navone M.
Comesana F.[8]
3-66-36-2
Quarter-finals
Guillen Meza A.
Huertas Del Pino A.
6-25-76-4
Bicknell B.
Buse I.
3-67-626-4
Olivo R.[2]
Bueno G.[8]
4-66-36-3
Dellien Velasco M.[4]
Lama G.[6]
6-27-66
Navone M.
Andreozzi G.
6-22-2
Tabilo A.
Burruchaga R.
6-27-5
Darderi L.
Varillas J.[1]
6-766-36-0
Comesana F.[8]
Galan D.[3]
6-46-4
R16
Huertas Del Pino A.
Reis Da Silva J.[3]
7-52-66-2
Dellien Velasco M.[4]
Sakamoto P.
5-76-06-0
Bueno G.[8]
Andrade A.
6-36-2
Buse I.
Vallejo A.
7-57-64
Bicknell B.
Ficovich J.[1]
7-54-66-3
Olivo R.[2]
Villanueva G.
0-66-36-4
Guillen Meza A.
Heide G.[5]
6-22-67-64
Lama G.[6]
Otegui J.
7-686-4
Andreozzi G.
Huertas Del Pino A.
6-25-76-4
Comesana F.[8]
Ymer E.
6-44-66-4
Tabilo A.
Huertas Del Pino C.
6-36-4
Burruchaga R.
Lavagno E.
6-36-0
Varillas J.[1]
Reis Da Silva J.
6-26-0
Darderi L.
Ugo Carabelli C.
6-46-2
Navone M.
Guillen Meza A.
6-36-2
Galan D.[3]
Giannessi A.
6-46-3
R32
Heide G.[5]
Monzon I.
6-06-736-1
Andrade A.
Aboian L.
6-36-4
Otegui J.
Franco Descotte M.
6-36-4
Olivo R.[2]
Huertas Del Pino C.
3-67-57-5
Villanueva G.
Prado Angelo J.
6-31-67-5
Sakamoto P.
Justo G.
6-47-65
Dellien Velasco M.[4]
Alves M.
6-12-66-0
Ficovich J.[1]
Farjat T.
6-17-61
Huertas Del Pino A.
Kuzuhara B.
6-41-66-3
Vallejo A.
Boscardin Dias P.
6-26-4
Reis Da Silva J.[3]
Leite W.
6-16-3
Buse I.
Dutra Da Silva D.[7]
3-66-36-2
Bicknell B.
Lilov V.
6-26-4
Guillen Meza A.
Aboian V.
6-16-2
Bueno G.[8]
Cossu M.
6-26-3
Lama G.[6]
Panta Herreros J.
6-746-47-5
Reis Da Silva J.
Vacherot V.
6-36-0
Varillas J.[1]
Meligeni Alves F.
7-646-786-4
Navone M.
Coria F.[2]
6-47-64
Guillen Meza A.
Buse I.
6-726-36-4
Andreozzi G.
Cerundolo J.[7]
6-36-3
Galan D.[3]
Alves M.
3-66-17-65
Huertas Del Pino C.
Diaz Acosta F.[5]
6-26-2
Darderi L.
Feldbausch K.
6-43-67-5
Ymer E.
Agamenone F.
3-66-16-4
Comesana F.[8]
Pacheco Mendez R.
6-46-2
Lavagno E.
Barrios Vera T.[4]
6-42-66-3
Ugo Carabelli C.
Dellien H.[6]
6-46-1
Giannessi A.
Roca Batalla O.
1-66-36-2
Tabilo A.
Vallejo A.
6-46-1
Burruchaga R.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-16-2
Huertas Del Pino A.
Crawford O.
7-56-0