Dominik Koepfer vs Charles Broom — Calgary CH Round of 32

Calgary CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
GER1
Dominik Koepfer
#1085ATP
32 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 November 2023
hard
GBR
Charles Broom
#283ATP
1409ELO
1396Hard ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLWWLL
Koepfer D.
6-2 6-3
Broom C.
Koepfer D.
662
Broom C.
230

Dominik Koepfer defeated Charles Broom 6-2 6-3 in the Calgary CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Charles Broom came in ranked #283, defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Koepfer D.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Broom C.

Broom C.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Koepfer D.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Koepfer D.Broom C.
1st serve in·Even
62%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Even
64%
63%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Even
60%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.3
6.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.4
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (111 vs 117). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Koepfer D.Broom C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
71
12
Break points saved·Dominant
94
56
Break points won·Dominant
28
0
Deciding sets·Dominant
95
42
Tiebreaks·Dominant
87
10

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Koepfer D.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Broom C.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 42 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.4
Surface form
5.7
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
6.8
Minutes 14d
4.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
Context
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Draxl L.
Koepfer D.[1]
6-46-3
Semi-finals
Koepfer D.[1]
Diallo G.
W/O
Draxl L.
Martin A.
7-655-76-3
Quarter-finals
Draxl L.
Montes De La Torre I.
7-55-76-1
Koepfer D.[1]
Bergs Z.[6]
6-16-3
Diallo G.
Dougaz A.[8]
6-36-2
Martin A.
Wallart E.
6-16-1
R16
Martin A.
Samuel T.
7-56-4
Wallart E.
Kasnikowski M.
7-697-64
Dougaz A.[8]
Diez S.
6-36-2
Koepfer D.[1]
Chidekh C.
6-36-3
Draxl L.
Saville L.
6-16-2
Bergs Z.[6]
Pannu K.
6-47-5
Montes De La Torre I.
Duckworth J.[2]
6-36-2
Diallo G.
Sousa J.
5-77-56-3
R32
Samuel T.
Seggerman R.
7-667-68
Kasnikowski M.
Paire B.[3]
6-36-736-3
Diez S.
Aguilar J.
6-31-66-3
Sousa J.
Brady P.
5-76-46-2
Diallo G.
Paulson A.
4-67-686-4
Wallart E.
Durasovic V.
1-67-56-3
Draxl L.
Coppejans K.[7]
6-46-1
Pannu K.
Jorda Sanchis D.
6-16-4
Duckworth J.[2]
Tu L.
6-26-4
Montes De La Torre I.
Boulais J.
6-46-1
Saville L.
Schoolkate T.
7-674-66-3
Martin A.
Peniston R.[5]
6-36-4
Dougaz A.[8]
Martin D.
6-27-5
Bergs Z.[6]
Lock B.
6-736-36-3
Chidekh C.
Vrbensky M.
6-46-2
Koepfer D.[1]
Broom C.
6-26-3