Mateus Alves vs Tristan Boyer — Lima CH Qualifying Round 2

Lima CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 2
BRA
Mateus Alves
#455ATP
1245ELO
1247Clay ELO
25 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 November 2023
clay
Tristan Boyer
USA4
Tristan Boyer
#164ATP
1561ELO
1545Clay ELO
$105kYTD
$960kCAREER
25 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWWL
Alves M.
6-1 7-6
Boyer T.
Alves M.
6772
Boyer T.
1650

Mateus Alves defeated Tristan Boyer 6-1 7-6 in the Lima CH qualifying round 2 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Mateus Alves came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Alves M.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Boyer T.

Boyer T.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Alves M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Alves M.Boyer T.
1st serve in·Even
61%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Even
63%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Even
62%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.4
3.7
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.8
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (152 vs 186). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Alves M.Boyer T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
8
43
Break points saved·Slight edge
77
83
Break points won·Slight edge
10
20
Deciding sets·Dominant
1
81
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
12
7

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Alves M.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Boyer T.
7.3
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
2.5Clay Elo 1247
Surface ELO
7.5+298 Clay Elo edge
1.9Overall Elo 1245
ELO gap
8.1Overall Elo 1561
4.6No prior meetings
H2H
5.4
3.8
Surface form
5.5
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
3.7
Minutes 14d
9.2
4.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Alves M.Boyer T.
Freshness·Clear edge
78
100

Alves M.: 1 day rest · 2 matches, 38 games (7d) · Boyer T.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Q2
Sakamoto P.[3]
Rodriguez S.
6-36-2
Buse I.
Roberts J.
6-47-5
Justo G.[6]
Hoyos Franco A.[10]
0-66-26-1
Lilov V.[2]
Tenti F.
6-27-5
Prado Angelo J.
Gomez J.
6-36-4
Franco Descotte M.[1]
Ballotta G.
6-36-1
Vacherot V.[5]
Luz O.[12]
6-26-766-3
Feldbausch K.
Mejia N.
6-27-64
Reis Da Silva J.[6]
Dutra Da Silva D.
6-25-76-1
Pucinelli De Almeida M.[11]
Olivo R.[3]
6-47-5
Alves M.
Boyer T.[4]
6-17-65
Guillen Meza A.[9]
Dellien Velasco M.[2]
5-76-26-3
Q1
Justo G.[6]
Schachter N.
6-776-36-3
Rodriguez S.
Ogura K.[11]
6-47-5
Roberts J.
Sheehy J.[5]
6-26-3
Tenti F.
Soto M.[7]
6-31-67-68
Buse I.
Buitrago N.
4-66-36-1
Ballotta G.
Rodriguez Rodriguez J.[9]
6-43-66-2
Prado Angelo J.
Carou I.[12]
6-36-1
Sakamoto P.[3]
Martin D.
6-26-2
Lilov V.[2]
Tacchi L.
6-46-1
Gomez J.
Cid R.[4]
3-66-44-1
Mejia N.
Campana Lee G.
6-36-2
Boyer T.[4]
Boscardin Dias P.
6-34-66-3
Reis Da Silva J.[6]
Alvarado Berrospi A.
6-06-1
Luz O.[12]
Villanueva G.
6-36-786-4
Olivo R.[3]
Nakamine L.
6-36-3
Alves M.
Ribeiro E.[8]
6-25-76-3
Guillen Meza A.[9]
Barrena A.
7-56-1
Dutra Da Silva D.
Elias G.[10]
6-26-0
Vacherot V.[5]
Houkes M.
6-46-726-4
Pucinelli De Almeida M.[11]
Panta Herreros J.
6-26-3
Feldbausch K.
Heide G.[1]
1-66-26-4