Roman Andres Burruchaga vs Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida — Lima CH Round of 32

Lima CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Roman Andres Burruchaga
ARG
Roman Andres Burruchaga
#67ATP
1711ELO
1694Clay ELO
$446kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
24 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 November 2023
clay
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
BRA
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
#294ATP
1412ELO
1404Clay ELO
25 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWLW
Burruchaga R.
6-1 6-2
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Burruchaga R.
662
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
120

Roman Andres Burruchaga defeated Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida 6-1 6-2 in the Lima CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Roman Andres Burruchaga came in ranked #67, defending last year's semi-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Burruchaga R.serving61% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Pucinelli De Almeida M.

Pucinelli De Almeida M.serving59% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Burruchaga R.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Burruchaga R.Pucinelli De Almeida M.
1st serve in·Even
61%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Even
60%
60%
Return points won·Even
43%
42%
Break points saved·Even
58%
57%
Aces / match·Even
2.2
1.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.5
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 151). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Burruchaga R.Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
66
5
Break points saved·Dominant
68
36
Break points won·Dominant
73
43
Deciding sets·Dominant
84
11
Tiebreaks·Dominant
64
1

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Burruchaga R.
7.7
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
9.6+290 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.4Clay Elo 1404
9.8Overall Elo 1711
ELO gap
0.2Overall Elo 1412
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.1
Surface form
4.5
7.03-match win streak
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
1.0
Minutes 14d
6.7
4.0
3-set count
4.0
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Burruchaga R.Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Freshness·Dominant
94
65

Burruchaga R.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 18 games (7d) · Pucinelli De Almeida M.: 4 days rest · 3 matches, 70 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Guillen Meza A.
Bicknell B.
7-636-1
Darderi L.
Navone M.
4-66-37-5
Semi-finals
Bicknell B.
Dellien Velasco M.[4]
3-67-666-3
Guillen Meza A.
Olivo R.[2]
7-57-5
Darderi L.
Tabilo A.
7-54-66-3
Navone M.
Comesana F.[8]
3-66-36-2
Quarter-finals
Guillen Meza A.
Huertas Del Pino A.
6-25-76-4
Bicknell B.
Buse I.
3-67-626-4
Olivo R.[2]
Bueno G.[8]
4-66-36-3
Dellien Velasco M.[4]
Lama G.[6]
6-27-66
Navone M.
Andreozzi G.
6-22-2
Tabilo A.
Burruchaga R.
6-27-5
Darderi L.
Varillas J.[1]
6-766-36-0
Comesana F.[8]
Galan D.[3]
6-46-4
R16
Huertas Del Pino A.
Reis Da Silva J.[3]
7-52-66-2
Dellien Velasco M.[4]
Sakamoto P.
5-76-06-0
Bueno G.[8]
Andrade A.
6-36-2
Buse I.
Vallejo A.
7-57-64
Bicknell B.
Ficovich J.[1]
7-54-66-3
Olivo R.[2]
Villanueva G.
0-66-36-4
Guillen Meza A.
Heide G.[5]
6-22-67-64
Lama G.[6]
Otegui J.
7-686-4
Andreozzi G.
Huertas Del Pino A.
6-25-76-4
Comesana F.[8]
Ymer E.
6-44-66-4
Tabilo A.
Huertas Del Pino C.
6-36-4
Burruchaga R.
Lavagno E.
6-36-0
Varillas J.[1]
Reis Da Silva J.
6-26-0
Darderi L.
Ugo Carabelli C.
6-46-2
Navone M.
Guillen Meza A.
6-36-2
Galan D.[3]
Giannessi A.
6-46-3
R32
Heide G.[5]
Monzon I.
6-06-736-1
Andrade A.
Aboian L.
6-36-4
Otegui J.
Franco Descotte M.
6-36-4
Olivo R.[2]
Huertas Del Pino C.
3-67-57-5
Villanueva G.
Prado Angelo J.
6-31-67-5
Sakamoto P.
Justo G.
6-47-65
Dellien Velasco M.[4]
Alves M.
6-12-66-0
Ficovich J.[1]
Farjat T.
6-17-61
Huertas Del Pino A.
Kuzuhara B.
6-41-66-3
Vallejo A.
Boscardin Dias P.
6-26-4
Reis Da Silva J.[3]
Leite W.
6-16-3
Buse I.
Dutra Da Silva D.[7]
3-66-36-2
Bicknell B.
Lilov V.
6-26-4
Guillen Meza A.
Aboian V.
6-16-2
Bueno G.[8]
Cossu M.
6-26-3
Lama G.[6]
Panta Herreros J.
6-746-47-5
Reis Da Silva J.
Vacherot V.
6-36-0
Varillas J.[1]
Meligeni Alves F.
7-646-786-4
Navone M.
Coria F.[2]
6-47-64
Guillen Meza A.
Buse I.
6-726-36-4
Andreozzi G.
Cerundolo J.[7]
6-36-3
Galan D.[3]
Alves M.
3-66-17-65
Huertas Del Pino C.
Diaz Acosta F.[5]
6-26-2
Darderi L.
Feldbausch K.
6-43-67-5
Ymer E.
Agamenone F.
3-66-16-4
Comesana F.[8]
Pacheco Mendez R.
6-46-2
Lavagno E.
Barrios Vera T.[4]
6-42-66-3
Ugo Carabelli C.
Dellien H.[6]
6-46-1
Giannessi A.
Roca Batalla O.
1-66-36-2
Tabilo A.
Vallejo A.
6-46-1
Burruchaga R.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-16-2
Huertas Del Pino A.
Crawford O.
7-56-0