Beibit Zhukayev vs Nino Serdarusic — Charlottesville CH Quarter-final

Charlottesville CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
KAZ
Beibit Zhukayev
#387ATP
1455ELO
1402Hard ELO
25 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 30 October 2023
hard
CRO
Nino Serdarusic
#1471ATP
29 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLWLL
Zhukayev B.
6-3 6-4
Serdarusic N.
Zhukayev B.
662
Serdarusic N.
340

Beibit Zhukayev defeated Nino Serdarusic 6-3 6-4 in the Charlottesville CH quarter-final on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Zhukayev B.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Serdarusic N.

Serdarusic N.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Zhukayev B.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Zhukayev B.Serdarusic N.
1st serve in·Even
61%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
77%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Even
66%
63%
Return points won·Even
33%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
10.9
4.5
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.6
1.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 93). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Zhukayev B.Serdarusic N.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
31
8
Break points saved·Dominant
94
66
Break points won·Even
1
5
Deciding sets·Clear edge
25
10
Tiebreaks·Dominant
63
23

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Zhukayev B.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Serdarusic N.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.0
Surface form
1.3
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
8.0
Minutes 14d
9.3
7.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Zhukayev B.
Mayo A.
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Zhukayev B.
Kypson P.
6-47-64
Mayo A.
Quinn E.
3-66-46-3
Quarter-finals
Kypson P.
Holt B.
6-16-4
Quinn E.
Paire B.[3]
7-656-2
Mayo A.
Ritschard A.
6-36-4
Zhukayev B.
Serdarusic N.
6-36-4
R16
Paire B.[3]
Gerch L.
W/O
Mayo A.
Opelka R.
W/O
Holt B.
Kingsley C.
6-46-4
Ritschard A.
Mmoh M.[1]
6-37-65
Zhukayev B.
Montes De La Torre I.
6-47-68
Quinn E.
Nava E.[5]
6-36-1
Kypson P.
Kudla D.[7]
6-16-3
Serdarusic N.
Damm M.
7-653-66-1
R32
Zhukayev B.
Kwiatkowski T.
4-67-637-63
Montes De La Torre I.
Walton A.[6]
6-23-67-64
Quinn E.
Krueger M.
3-67-626-4
Gerch L.
Kozlov S.
6-25-77-65
Opelka R.
Sandgren T.[8]
6-47-5
Ritschard A.
Mchugh A.
6-46-4
Kingsley C.
Michelsen A.[2]
7-56-3
Mayo A.
Ayeni O.
7-56-2
Paire B.[3]
King D.
7-636-2
Mmoh M.[1]
Johnson S.
7-667-5
Kudla D.[7]
Rodesch C.
7-656-1
Serdarusic N.
Spizzirri E.
6-12-66-4
Damm M.
Svajda Z.[4]
2-66-37-63
Holt B.
Gomez E.
6-26-2
Kypson P.
Debru G.
6-47-5
Nava E.[5]
Tomic B.
2-67-617-5