Ethan Quinn vs Benoit Paire — Charlottesville CH Quarter-final

Charlottesville CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Ethan Quinn
USA
Ethan Quinn
#47ATP
1804ELO
1767Hard ELO
$724kYTD
$2.1MCAREER
22 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 30 October 2023
hard
FRA3
Benoit Paire
#1096ATP
1362ELO
1336Hard ELO
37 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLW
Quinn E.
7-6 6-2
Paire B.
Quinn E.
7762
Paire B.
6520

Ethan Quinn defeated Benoit Paire 7-6 6-2 in the Charlottesville CH quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Ethan Quinn came in ranked #47, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

  • Match story: Ethan Quinn closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Quinn E.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Paire B.

Paire B.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Quinn E.

Serve advantage — Quinn E.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Quinn E.Paire B.
37
Serve
—
21
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Quinn E.Paire B.
1st serve in·Slight edge
62%
52%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
74%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
50%
44%
Service points won·Slight edge
64%
59%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
62%
57%
Aces / match·Even
6.2
6.8
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.8
6.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (186 vs 147). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Quinn E.Paire B.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
71
48
Break points saved·Slight edge
95
90
Break points won·Clear edge
19
31
Deciding sets·Dominant
98
53
Tiebreaks·Dominant
97
58

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Quinn E.
7.2
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Paire B.
2.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
10.0+432 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.0Hard Elo 1336
10.0Overall Elo 1804
ELO gap
0.0Overall Elo 1362
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.7
Surface form
3.8
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
7.7
3-set count
7.0
6.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Quinn E.Paire B.
Freshness·
97
—

Quinn E.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Zhukayev B.
Mayo A.
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Zhukayev B.
Kypson P.
6-47-64
Mayo A.
Quinn E.
3-66-46-3
Quarter-finals
Kypson P.
Holt B.
6-16-4
Quinn E.
Paire B.[3]
7-656-2
Mayo A.
Ritschard A.
6-36-4
Zhukayev B.
Serdarusic N.
6-36-4
R16
Paire B.[3]
Gerch L.
W/O
Mayo A.
Opelka R.
W/O
Holt B.
Kingsley C.
6-46-4
Ritschard A.
Mmoh M.[1]
6-37-65
Zhukayev B.
Montes De La Torre I.
6-47-68
Quinn E.
Nava E.[5]
6-36-1
Kypson P.
Kudla D.[7]
6-16-3
Serdarusic N.
Damm M.
7-653-66-1
R32
Zhukayev B.
Kwiatkowski T.
4-67-637-63
Montes De La Torre I.
Walton A.[6]
6-23-67-64
Quinn E.
Krueger M.
3-67-626-4
Gerch L.
Kozlov S.
6-25-77-65
Opelka R.
Sandgren T.[8]
6-47-5
Ritschard A.
Mchugh A.
6-46-4
Kingsley C.
Michelsen A.[2]
7-56-3
Mayo A.
Ayeni O.
7-56-2
Paire B.[3]
King D.
7-636-2
Mmoh M.[1]
Johnson S.
7-667-5
Kudla D.[7]
Rodesch C.
7-656-1
Serdarusic N.
Spizzirri E.
6-12-66-4
Damm M.
Svajda Z.[4]
2-66-37-63
Holt B.
Gomez E.
6-26-2
Kypson P.
Debru G.
6-47-5
Nava E.[5]
Tomic B.
2-67-617-5