Ji Sung Nam vs Yusuke Takahashi — Sydney CH Qualifying Round 2

Sydney CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 2
KOR
Ji Sung Nam
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 30 October 2023
hard
Yusuke Takahashi
JPN5
Yusuke Takahashi
#671ATP
1268ELO
1243Hard ELO
28 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWLWLW
Nam J.
6-3 6-1
Takahashi Y.
Nam J.
662
Takahashi Y.
310

Ji Sung Nam defeated Yusuke Takahashi 6-3 6-1 in the Sydney CH qualifying round 2 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Yusuke Takahashi came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nam J.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Takahashi Y.

Takahashi Y.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Nam J.

Serve advantage — Takahashi Y.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Nam J.Takahashi Y.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
67%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
47%
53%
Service points won·Even
59%
62%
Return points won·Even
40%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
55%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.3
2.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.4
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (81 vs 123). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nam J.Takahashi Y.
Clutch Rating·Even
0
0
Break points saved·Slight edge
26
36
Break points won·Clear edge
21
7
Deciding sets·Slight edge
14
3
Tiebreaks·Even
12
11

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Nam J.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Takahashi Y.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.8
Surface form
4.3
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
Minutes 14d
5.8
4.0
3-set count
4.0
9.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Q2
Dellavedova M.[11]
Romios M.
7-633-66-1
Statham J.[2]
Wehnelt K.[9]
6-47-62
Seggerman R.
Mott B.[1]
3-66-36-4
Moriya H.[8]
Ly N.[6]
6-736-36-3
Nam J.
Takahashi Y.[5]
6-36-1
Rai A.[3]
Ochi M.[10]
7-56-2
Q1
Moriya H.[8]
Court J.
6-33-66-4
Wehnelt K.[9]
Van Rensburg S.
6-16-2
Romios M.
Fancutt T.[4]
6-16-3
Takahashi Y.[5]
Yin B.
6-26-3
Statham J.[2]
Gadecki T.
6-46-3
Ly N.[6]
Hulme M.
6-46-3
Dellavedova M.[11]
Braithwaite T.
6-36-2
Ochi M.[10]
Bouzige M.
6-26-2
Rai A.[3]
Puttergill C.
6-12-66-3
Nam J.
Klintcharov A.
6-27-63
Seggerman R.
Pearson K.
6-47-64
Mott B.[1]
Inui Y.
7-56-786-2