Ji Sung Nam vs Dane Sweeny — Sydney CH Round of 16

Sydney CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
KOR
Ji Sung Nam
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 30 October 2023
hard
AUS
Dane Sweeny
#122ATP
1460ELO
1444Hard ELO
$256kYTD
$861kCAREER
25 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWWL
Nam J.
6-4 6-2
Sweeny D.
Nam J.
662
Sweeny D.
420

Ji Sung Nam defeated Dane Sweeny 6-4 6-2 in the Sydney CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Dane Sweeny came in leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending last year's round of 32. Ji Sung Nam claimed a first win over Dane Sweeny in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-02-01Great Ocean Road OpenR64hardDane Sweeny7-6(4) 7-5

Serve vs return

This season
Nam J.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Sweeny D.

Sweeny D.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Nam J.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Nam J.Sweeny D.
1st serve in·Even
60%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
51%
Service points won·Even
59%
60%
Return points won·Even
40%
39%
Break points saved·Even
55%
58%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.3
2.5
Double faults / match·Even
3.4
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (81 vs 150). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nam J.Sweeny D.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
0
45
Break points saved·Dominant
26
69
Break points won·Slight edge
21
11
Deciding sets·Dominant
14
68
Tiebreaks·Dominant
12
86

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Nam J.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Sweeny D.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
0.0
H2H
10.0
2.8
Surface form
6.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
Minutes 14d
9.1
4.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Nam J.Sweeny D.
Freshness·
—
97

Sweeny D.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Daniel T.[3]
Polmans M.[6]
6-26-4
Semi-finals
Polmans M.[6]
Kokkinakis T.[1]
3-2
Daniel T.[3]
Hijikata R.[2]
3-66-27-65
Quarter-finals
Daniel T.[3]
Mochizuki S.[5]
3-1
Hijikata R.[2]
Nam J.
6-757-57-65
Polmans M.[6]
Mott B.
6-34-66-3
Kokkinakis T.[1]
Noguchi R.
6-37-65
R16
Mochizuki S.[5]
Uchida K.
7-6107-5
Hijikata R.[2]
Wong C.
4-66-36-2
Nam J.
Sweeny D.
6-46-2
Daniel T.[3]
Saville L.
6-46-2
Polmans M.[6]
Weber A.
6-46-4
Noguchi R.
Moriya H.
6-16-2
Kokkinakis T.[1]
Sekulic P.
7-57-5
Mott B.
Seggerman R.
6-26-3
R32
Mochizuki S.[5]
Jasika O.
6-46-4
Daniel T.[3]
Uchiyama Y.
6-22-1
Mott B.
Statham J.
6-36-4
Wong C.
Marinkov P.
7-656-2
Sweeny D.
Takahashi Y.
4-66-37-67
Nam J.
Schoolkate T.[8]
7-696-4
Uchida K.
Shimizu Y.
6-36-2
Weber A.
Bradshaw J.
7-56-2
Seggerman R.
Lock B.
6-34-66-4
Noguchi R.
Hong S.[7]
6-26-2
Moriya H.
Nakagawa N.
6-37-68
Sekulic P.
Rai A.
6-27-62
Kokkinakis T.[1]
Peliwo F.
6-36-1
Polmans M.[6]
Sinclair C.
6-46-2
Hijikata R.[2]
Dellavedova M.
6-36-4
Saville L.
Ellis B.
7-56-2