Ryan Seggerman vs Benjamin Lock — Sydney CH Round of 32

Sydney CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA
Ryan Seggerman
#649ATP
26 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 30 October 2023
hard
ZIM
Benjamin Lock
33 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWWL
Seggerman R.
6-3 4-6 6-4
Lock B.
Seggerman R.
6462
Lock B.
3641

Ryan Seggerman defeated Benjamin Lock 6-3 4-6 6-4 in the Sydney CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Ryan Seggerman closed it out in three sets, 6–3 4–6 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Seggerman R.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Lock B.

Lock B.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Seggerman R.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Seggerman R.Lock B.
1st serve in·Even
62%
66%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
51%
Service points won·Even
65%
63%
Return points won·Even
33%
36%
Break points saved·Even
60%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
9.1
4.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.0
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (90 vs 78). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Seggerman R.Lock B.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
33
0
Break points saved·Clear edge
70
46
Break points won·Even
0
0
Deciding sets·Dominant
74
3
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
26
45

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Seggerman R.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Lock B.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
3.7
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
8.5
Minutes 14d
9.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Seggerman R.Lock B.
Freshness·
91
—

Seggerman R.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 22 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Daniel T.[3]
Polmans M.[6]
6-26-4
Semi-finals
Polmans M.[6]
Kokkinakis T.[1]
3-2
Daniel T.[3]
Hijikata R.[2]
3-66-27-65
Quarter-finals
Daniel T.[3]
Mochizuki S.[5]
3-1
Hijikata R.[2]
Nam J.
6-757-57-65
Polmans M.[6]
Mott B.
6-34-66-3
Kokkinakis T.[1]
Noguchi R.
6-37-65
R16
Mochizuki S.[5]
Uchida K.
7-6107-5
Hijikata R.[2]
Wong C.
4-66-36-2
Nam J.
Sweeny D.
6-46-2
Daniel T.[3]
Saville L.
6-46-2
Polmans M.[6]
Weber A.
6-46-4
Noguchi R.
Moriya H.
6-16-2
Kokkinakis T.[1]
Sekulic P.
7-57-5
Mott B.
Seggerman R.
6-26-3
R32
Mochizuki S.[5]
Jasika O.
6-46-4
Daniel T.[3]
Uchiyama Y.
6-22-1
Mott B.
Statham J.
6-36-4
Wong C.
Marinkov P.
7-656-2
Sweeny D.
Takahashi Y.
4-66-37-67
Nam J.
Schoolkate T.[8]
7-696-4
Uchida K.
Shimizu Y.
6-36-2
Weber A.
Bradshaw J.
7-56-2
Seggerman R.
Lock B.
6-34-66-4
Noguchi R.
Hong S.[7]
6-26-2
Moriya H.
Nakagawa N.
6-37-68
Sekulic P.
Rai A.
6-27-62
Kokkinakis T.[1]
Peliwo F.
6-36-1
Polmans M.[6]
Sinclair C.
6-46-2
Hijikata R.[2]
Dellavedova M.
6-36-4
Saville L.
Ellis B.
7-56-2