Cem Ilkel vs Illya Marchenko — Bergamo CH Round of 32

Bergamo CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Cem Ilkel
TUR
Cem Ilkel
#1462ATP
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 30 October 2023
hard
UKR
Illya Marchenko
#1740ATP
38 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLLLL
Ilkel C.
6-7 6-4 7-5
Marchenko I.
Ilkel C.
63672
Marchenko I.
77451

Cem Ilkel defeated Illya Marchenko 6-7 6-4 7-5 in the Bergamo CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Cem Ilkel came in ranked #1462, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ilkel C.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Marchenko I.

Marchenko I.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Ilkel C.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ilkel C.Marchenko I.
1st serve in·Even
58%
56%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
51%
Service points won·Even
62%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
55%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.6
5.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.3
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (90 vs 95). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ilkel C.Marchenko I.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
32
13
Break points saved·Dominant
49
80
Break points won·Even
3
7
Deciding sets·Dominant
70
14
Tiebreaks·Dominant
66
10

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ilkel C.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Marchenko I.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
4.3
Surface form
8.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.4
Minutes 14d
1.8
3-set count
0.0
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Draper J.[1]
Goffin D.[5]
1-67-636-3
Semi-finals
Draper J.[1]
Nakashima B.
6-13-67-5
Goffin D.[5]
Lajal M.
6-746-36-4
Quarter-finals
Goffin D.[5]
Molcan A.[4]
7-56-2
Lajal M.
Herbert P.
6-756-46-4
Nakashima B.
Fognini F.[8]
6-17-5
Draper J.[1]
Harris B.
6-26-3
R16
Harris B.
Albot R.[7]
1-66-36-4
Goffin D.[5]
Passaro F.
6-37-5
Nakashima B.
Broady L.[3]
6-46-0
Fognini F.[8]
Grenier H.
6-726-27-65
Lajal M.
Blanchet U.
6-26-746-2
Herbert P.
Ilkel C.
6-16-1
Draper J.[1]
Vavassori A.
6-36-4
Molcan A.[4]
Brouwer G.
3-67-637-63
R32
Brouwer G.
Gaio F.
6-37-5
Molcan A.[4]
Gigante M.
6-26-2
Fognini F.[8]
Martineau M.
6-36-4
Lajal M.
Sels J.
6-36-2
Herbert P.
Cobolli F.[2]
7-656-3
Ilkel C.
Marchenko I.
6-736-47-5
Passaro F.
Moreno De Alboran N.
7-636-3
Blanchet U.
Riedi L.
7-652-67-5
Draper J.[1]
Maestrelli F.
6-46-4
Broady L.[3]
Fery A.
6-37-64
Nakashima B.
Kukushkin M.
6-16-4
Harris B.
Hemery C.
7-672-66-3
Vavassori A.
Travaglia S.
6-46-2
Grenier H.
Bailly G.
6-26-4
Albot R.[7]
Onclin G.
6-766-06-0
Goffin D.[5]
Vincent Ruggeri S.
6-47-64