Nam Hoang Ly vs Matt Hulme — Sydney CH Qualifying Round 1

Sydney CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
VIE6
Nam Hoang Ly
29 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 30 October 2023
hard
AUS
Matt Hulme
#1097ATP
27 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLLLL
Ly N.
6-4 6-3
Hulme M.
Ly N.
662
Hulme M.
430

Nam Hoang Ly defeated Matt Hulme 6-4 6-3 in the Sydney CH qualifying round 1 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Nam Hoang Ly closed it out in two sets, 6–4 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ly N.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Hulme M.

Hulme M.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Ly N.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ly N.Hulme M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
70%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
69%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
49%
56%
Service points won·Slight edge
59%
65%
Return points won·Even
39%
35%
Break points saved·Clear edge
54%
67%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.8
7.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.0
1.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (26 vs 26). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ly N.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Hulme M.
4.2
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 364 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.3
Surface form
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.7
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Q2
Dellavedova M.[11]
Romios M.
7-633-66-1
Statham J.[2]
Wehnelt K.[9]
6-47-62
Seggerman R.
Mott B.[1]
3-66-36-4
Moriya H.[8]
Ly N.[6]
6-736-36-3
Nam J.
Takahashi Y.[5]
6-36-1
Rai A.[3]
Ochi M.[10]
7-56-2
Q1
Moriya H.[8]
Court J.
6-33-66-4
Wehnelt K.[9]
Van Rensburg S.
6-16-2
Romios M.
Fancutt T.[4]
6-16-3
Takahashi Y.[5]
Yin B.
6-26-3
Statham J.[2]
Gadecki T.
6-46-3
Ly N.[6]
Hulme M.
6-46-3
Dellavedova M.[11]
Braithwaite T.
6-36-2
Ochi M.[10]
Bouzige M.
6-26-2
Rai A.[3]
Puttergill C.
6-12-66-3
Nam J.
Klintcharov A.
6-27-63
Seggerman R.
Pearson K.
6-47-64
Mott B.[1]
Inui Y.
7-56-786-2