Brandon Holt vs Cannon Kingsley — Charlottesville CH Round of 16

Charlottesville CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
USA
Brandon Holt
#657ATP
1537ELO
1507Hard ELO
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 30 October 2023
hard
USA
Cannon Kingsley
#421ATP
1342ELO
1345Hard ELO
25 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLWWLW
Holt B.
6-4 6-4
Kingsley C.
Holt B.
662
Kingsley C.
440

Brandon Holt defeated Cannon Kingsley 6-4 6-4 in the Charlottesville CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Brandon Holt edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Holt B.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Kingsley C.

Kingsley C.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Holt B.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Holt B.Kingsley C.
1st serve in·Even
66%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
52%
Service points won·Even
63%
64%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Even
60%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.8
6.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.0
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (189 vs 94). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Holt B.Kingsley C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
58
21
Break points saved·Slight edge
85
74
Break points won·Clear edge
31
19
Deciding sets·Dominant
79
27
Tiebreaks·Dominant
69
20

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Holt B.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Kingsley C.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.0+163 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.0Hard Elo 1345
7.4Overall Elo 1537
ELO gap
2.6Overall Elo 1342
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
4.8
Surface form
5.9
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Zhukayev B.
Mayo A.
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Zhukayev B.
Kypson P.
6-47-64
Mayo A.
Quinn E.
3-66-46-3
Quarter-finals
Kypson P.
Holt B.
6-16-4
Quinn E.
Paire B.[3]
7-656-2
Mayo A.
Ritschard A.
6-36-4
Zhukayev B.
Serdarusic N.
6-36-4
R16
Paire B.[3]
Gerch L.
W/O
Mayo A.
Opelka R.
W/O
Holt B.
Kingsley C.
6-46-4
Ritschard A.
Mmoh M.[1]
6-37-65
Zhukayev B.
Montes De La Torre I.
6-47-68
Quinn E.
Nava E.[5]
6-36-1
Kypson P.
Kudla D.[7]
6-16-3
Serdarusic N.
Damm M.
7-653-66-1
R32
Zhukayev B.
Kwiatkowski T.
4-67-637-63
Montes De La Torre I.
Walton A.[6]
6-23-67-64
Quinn E.
Krueger M.
3-67-626-4
Gerch L.
Kozlov S.
6-25-77-65
Opelka R.
Sandgren T.[8]
6-47-5
Ritschard A.
Mchugh A.
6-46-4
Kingsley C.
Michelsen A.[2]
7-56-3
Mayo A.
Ayeni O.
7-56-2
Paire B.[3]
King D.
7-636-2
Mmoh M.[1]
Johnson S.
7-667-5
Kudla D.[7]
Rodesch C.
7-656-1
Serdarusic N.
Spizzirri E.
6-12-66-4
Damm M.
Svajda Z.[4]
2-66-37-63
Holt B.
Gomez E.
6-26-2
Kypson P.
Debru G.
6-47-5
Nava E.[5]
Tomic B.
2-67-617-5