Brandon Holt vs Emilio Gomez — Charlottesville CH Round of 32

Charlottesville CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA
Brandon Holt
#657ATP
1537ELO
1507Hard ELO
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 30 October 2023
hard
ECU
Emilio Gomez
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWLLW
Holt B.
6-2 6-2
Gomez E.
Holt B.
662
Gomez E.
220

Brandon Holt defeated Emilio Gomez 6-2 6-2 in the Charlottesville CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Brandon Holt came in defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Holt B.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Gomez E.

Gomez E.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Holt B.

Serve advantage — Holt B.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Holt B.Gomez E.
1st serve in·Slight edge
66%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
67%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
51%
46%
Service points won·Even
63%
59%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Even
60%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.8
3.2
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.0
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (189 vs 55). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Holt B.Gomez E.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
58
32
Break points saved·Slight edge
85
77
Break points won·Clear edge
31
19
Deciding sets·Dominant
79
23
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
69
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Holt B.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Gomez E.
4.1
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 42 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
4.8
Surface form
2.3
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Prev. match
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Zhukayev B.
Mayo A.
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Zhukayev B.
Kypson P.
6-47-64
Mayo A.
Quinn E.
3-66-46-3
Quarter-finals
Kypson P.
Holt B.
6-16-4
Quinn E.
Paire B.[3]
7-656-2
Mayo A.
Ritschard A.
6-36-4
Zhukayev B.
Serdarusic N.
6-36-4
R16
Paire B.[3]
Gerch L.
W/O
Mayo A.
Opelka R.
W/O
Holt B.
Kingsley C.
6-46-4
Ritschard A.
Mmoh M.[1]
6-37-65
Zhukayev B.
Montes De La Torre I.
6-47-68
Quinn E.
Nava E.[5]
6-36-1
Kypson P.
Kudla D.[7]
6-16-3
Serdarusic N.
Damm M.
7-653-66-1
R32
Zhukayev B.
Kwiatkowski T.
4-67-637-63
Montes De La Torre I.
Walton A.[6]
6-23-67-64
Quinn E.
Krueger M.
3-67-626-4
Gerch L.
Kozlov S.
6-25-77-65
Opelka R.
Sandgren T.[8]
6-47-5
Ritschard A.
Mchugh A.
6-46-4
Kingsley C.
Michelsen A.[2]
7-56-3
Mayo A.
Ayeni O.
7-56-2
Paire B.[3]
King D.
7-636-2
Mmoh M.[1]
Johnson S.
7-667-5
Kudla D.[7]
Rodesch C.
7-656-1
Serdarusic N.
Spizzirri E.
6-12-66-4
Damm M.
Svajda Z.[4]
2-66-37-63
Holt B.
Gomez E.
6-26-2
Kypson P.
Debru G.
6-47-5
Nava E.[5]
Tomic B.
2-67-617-5